PCR Testing of Filter Material from IVC Lids for Microbial Monitoring of Mouse Colonies

Testing sentinel animals exposed to soiled bedding from colony animals is the most common method used for health monitoring in rodent facilities. Although environmental sampling is being explored-and, in many cases, has been implemented-as an alternative, exhaust plenum sampling is not effective for all ventilated rack designs. This study evaluated PCR testing of filter paper from sentinel cages on ventilated racks. We hypothesized that testing filter paper from cages containing soiled bedding would be as effective as testing sentinel mice and that periodic shaking of cages would generate sufficient particulate movement to substitute for the presence of live animals. Three cages containing soiled bedding were maintained in each of 8 rooms; one cage contained 2 Cr:NIH(S) mice, one had no mice and was shaken twice weekly, and the remaining one had no mice and was left undisturbed. For 3 consecutive months, a piece of filter paper from the undersurface of the cage lid was tested monthly for adventitial agents and then replaced. A second piece remained on the cage undersurface for 3 mo. Fecal pellets and oral and fur swabs were collected from sentinel mice at months 1 and 3 and tested for the same agents. At month 3, serology was performed on the sentinel mice; feces and oral and fur swabs from colony animals were tested concurrently for comparison. Filter paper from cages without mice and shaken were at least as effective than all other methods in detecting the presence of endemic agents, including mouse norovirus, Helicobacter spp., Pasteurella pneumotropica, Entamoeba muris, and Spironucleus muris. For IVC systems where exhaust plenum testing is ineffective, PCR testing of IVC filter tops should be considered as an alternative to soiled bedding sentinels. Environmental sampling may provide increased reliability and reduce the number of rodents used for routine health surveillance.