Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
Ten quality indicators for endoscopic submucosal dissection: what should be monitored and reported to improve quality
Lorenzo Fuccio1, Pradeep Bhandari2, Roberta Maselli3
1Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract:
In the last decade, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become more popular in Asia and, more recently, also in Europe and North America, however the issue of quality control has never been raised. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify possible quality indicators to monitor as part of internal audit process. This is particularly compelling, since the diffusion of ESD outside Asian, super-expert, high-volume, tertiary referral centers. In the current review, we raised the issue of quality control for ESD and proposed a list of ten possible quality indicators that should be monitored by each endoscopist and reported in every study reporting results on ESD procedures. We feel that these quality indicators should be used in clinical practice by endoscopists to benchmark the data with the internationally recommended standards.
Related Concept Videos
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance
Quality of Water
Pulse amplitude and quality
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...
Testing Water Quality
Indicators

