Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Identifying priority outcomes that influence selection of disease-modifying therapies in MS
Gregory S Day1, Alexander Rae-Grant1, Melissa J Armstrong1
1The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology (GSD), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (AR-G), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (MJA), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville; Departments of Community Health Sciences and Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (TP), University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Biostatistics (SSC), University of Alabama Birmingham; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences (RAM), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Background:
Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) may now choose from a broad array of approved disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). The priority that patients and practitioners assign to specific clinical outcomes is likely to influence the MS DMT selection process.
Methods:
We invited 9,126 participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry and 18 members of the American Academy of Neurology MS DMT guideline development panel to complete a brief survey prioritizing outcomes of importance to MS DMT selection. The frequency of outcomes ranked as first, second, or third priority by respondents were compared across groups.
Results:
A total of 2,056 of 9,126 (23.6%) NARCOMS participants and all 18 members of the MS DMT guideline development panel (100%) completed the survey. Reduced disability progression was identified as a priority by a majority of respondents in both groups. Guideline panelists tended to be more likely than persons with MS to prioritize relapse rate reduction (p = 0.055). Respondents from both groups commonly cited the "selection of therapies most likely to lead to improvements in quality of life measures, MS symptoms, and preservation of cognition" as top priorities in DMT selection; however, these priority outcomes were reported in fewer than 20% of clinical trials used to inform MS DMT guideline development.
Conclusion:
Specific outcomes were defined by similar proportions of persons with MS and guideline panelists as priority outcomes influencing MS DMT selection. Several of these priority outcomes were not routinely reported in clinical trials, identifying areas for future evidence development.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Therapy
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Disease States and Pharmacology
Substances such as alcohol and specific drugs, including antineoplastics, can also negatively impact drug absorption. For instance,...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Frequency-dependent Selection
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

