Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Law of Effect

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

Instinctive Drift

Instinctive Drift

Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

William D. Timberlake (1942-2019).

The American psychologist·2020

Same author

Superstition revisited: Sex, species, and adventitious reinforcement.

Behavioural processes·2019

Same author

Selecting and Testing Environmental Enrichment in Lemurs.

Frontiers in psychology·2019

Same author

Foraging devices as enrichment in captive walruses (Odobenus rosmarus).

Behavioural processes·2019

Same author

Training penguins to interact with enrichment devices for lasting effects.

Zoo biology·2019

Same author

Do rats learn conditional independence?

Royal Society open science·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

Causal reasoning in rats' behaviour systems.

Robert Ian Bowers^1,2, William Timberlake³

¹Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Royal Society Open Science

|August 16, 2018

Summary

Rats

Keywords:

Bayesian networks Rattus norvegicus behaviour systems causal model theory causal reasoning cognitive modelling

More Related Videos

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Area of Science:

Animal behavior
Cognitive science
Causal inference

Background:

Previous research suggested rats form causal models of their environment.
These models were thought to be represented as mental maps.
Debate exists on whether rats possess general causal reasoning abilities.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate rats' causal reasoning capacities.
To differentiate between causal model theory and response competition explanations.
To explore the role of motivational factors in behavior.

Main Methods:

Replication of a key experimental effect.
Utilized continuous and fine-grained behavioral measurements.
Recorded a broader range of behaviors than in prior studies.

Main Results:

Observed behaviors inconsistent with both causal model theory and response competition.
Detailed analysis of previously cited results revealed unexpected patterns.
Self-production of a stimulus reduced subsequent responses, aligning with Bayesian network predictions.

Conclusions:

Findings challenge existing explanations of rat causal reasoning.
Suggests a specific-process approach incorporating motivational factors is more appropriate.
Bayesian network predictions offer a complementary normative framework.
Behavior systems theory provides a stronger theoretical foundation than representational-map theories.