Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Diagnostic concordance between NT-proBNP and BNP for suspected heart failure
Christopher W Farnsworth1, Adam L Bailey1, Alan S Jaffe2
1Department of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Insights
Diagnostic concordance between B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) for heart failure (HF) is relatively low, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease. Current cutoffs require re-evaluation for accurate HF diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- Clinical guidelines consider B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) comparable for diagnosing and monitoring heart failure (HF).
- Limited large-scale studies have directly assessed the diagnostic concordance between BNP and NT-proBNP.
- Accurate HF diagnosis relies on reliable biomarker interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic concordance between BNP and NT-proBNP for ruling in and ruling out heart failure (HF).
- To assess the correlation between BNP and NT-proBNP levels across different patient populations.
- To investigate the impact of renal function on the concordance of these natriuretic peptides.
Main Methods:
- Simultaneous testing of BNP and NT-proBNP on 2729 patient samples.
- Utilized recommended cutoffs for BNP and NT-proBNP to assess diagnostic concordance and correlation.
- Analyzed concordance based on hospital setting (ED vs. non-ED) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
Main Results:
- Concordance between BNP and NT-proBNP was moderate (weighted kappa 0.695 in ED, 0.642 in non-ED).
- Lower concordance observed in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m² compared to those with eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73m².
- Significant differences in NT-proBNP to BNP ratios were noted in patients with impaired renal function; temporal measurements showed discordant trends in 19.7% of cases.
Conclusions:
- Current diagnostic cutoffs for BNP and NT-proBNP demonstrate relatively low concordance and correlation for HF diagnosis.
- Diagnostic performance is particularly compromised in patients with chronic kidney disease.
- Re-evaluation of established cutoffs is warranted to improve diagnostic accuracy for heart failure.
Objectives:
BNP and NT-proBNP are viewed as comparable in their ability to diagnose and monitor HF in clinical guidelines. However, no recent large-scale study has directly established diagnostic concordance between BNP and NT-proBNP. This study sought to assess diagnostic concordance of BNP and NT-proBNP for ruling in and ruling out heart failure (HF).
Methods:
Simultaneous BNP and NT-proBNP testing was performed on 2729 patient samples with routinely ordered BNP testing. Hospital location, age, sex, creatinine, BNP and NT-proBNP were also recorded. Recommended cutoffs for BNP and NT-proBNP for ruling in and out HF were used for assessing diagnostic concordance and correlation.
Results:
In the ED setting, concordance between BNP and NT-proBNP was 0.695 (95% CI, 0.668-0.723) by weighted kappa using the recommended cutoffs for the acute setting. In non-ED patients, the concordance was 0.642 (95% CI, 0.580-0.705) using non-acute setting cutoffs. In the ED setting, patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 had lower overall concordance (0.626; 95% CI 0.580-0.672) compared to those with eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73m2 (0.707, 95% CI 0.669-0.744). Patients with an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m2 had a much higher ratio of NT-proBNP to BNP than patients with eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73m2 (17.0 vs. 4.7, P < .001). Linear regression revealed an r2 of 0.52 in the ED setting and 0.49 in the non-ED setting between BNP and NT-proBNP. For 368 patients with multiple measurements of natriuretic peptides, 19.7% of paired temporal measurements had an increase in one peptide and a decrease in the other.
Conclusion:
The current cutoffs for diagnosing HF for NT-proBNP and BNP have relatively low diagnostic concordance and correlation, particularly among patients with chronic kidney disease.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics

