Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Models and Methods to Evaluate Transport of Drug Delivery Systems Across Cellular Barriers
Published on: October 17, 2013
Utilizing Pediatric Scoring Systems to Predict Disposition During Interfacility Transport
Insights
Pediatric transport severity scoring systems like PedCTAS, TPEWS, and TRAP effectively predict pediatric intensive care unit admissions. The PRISM III score was not predictive for PICU admissions in this study.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Transport medicine
- Health informatics
Background:
- Interfacility transport of pediatric patients presents challenges in determining appropriate care disposition.
- Severity of illness scoring systems can aid in matching patient acuity with necessary care levels.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of currently used scoring systems in matching pediatric transport patients' severity of illness with required care levels.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of a regional transport registry (2015-2016) including 209 pediatric patients.
- Calculation and comparison of Pediatric RISk of Mortality III (PRISM III), Canadian Pediatric Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS), Transport Pediatric Early Warning Scores (TPEWS), and Transport Risk Assessment in Pediatrics (TRAP) scores.
- Descriptive statistics, binomial logistic regression, and kappa statistics for interrater reliability were used.
Main Results:
- PedCTAS (score 1), TPEWS (score ≥6 or category 3), and TRAP (score ≥4) were significantly associated with pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission.
- Odds ratios for PICU admission were 37.2 for PedCTAS, 42.2 for TPEWS, and 7.2 for TRAP.
- PRISM III scores did not predict PICU admissions.
Conclusions:
- Elevated PedCTAS, TPEWS, and TRAP scores are strongly associated with PICU admission in the interfacility pediatric transport setting.
- These scoring systems demonstrate utility in guiding care disposition for critically ill pediatric patients during transport.
Objective:
Determining care disposition for pediatric patients during interfacility transport is often challenging. Severity of illness scoring can assist with this process. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare currently utilized scoring systems and their ability to reliably match pediatric transport patients' severity of illness with the level of care necessary.
Methods:
The retrospective transport registry review for our region included 209 patients <18 years, transported between 2015 and 2016 and admitted to tertiary care. The Pediatric RISk of Mortality III (PRISM III); Canadian Pediatric Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS); Transport Pediatric Early Warning Scores (TPEWS); and Transport Risk Assessment in Pediatrics (TRAP) scores were calculated. Descriptive statistics and binomial logistic regression were utilized to compare the scoring tools. Interrater reliability was calculated using kappa statistics. All analyses were computed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.
Results:
Patients were more likely to be admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with PedCTAS = 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 37.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4, 111.4; p < 0.0001), TPEWS = 3 in one category or total score ≥6 (OR = 42.2; 95% CI, 17.0, 104.9; p < 0.0001), and TRAP ≥4 (OR = 7.2; 95% CI, 3.8, 13.5; p < 0.0001). PRISM scores were not predictive for PICU admissions.
Conclusion:
Elevated PedCTAS, TPEWS, and TRAP scores are strongly associated with PICU admission within the interfacility transport setting.
Related Concept Videos
Primary Active Transport
Secondary Active Transport
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Predicting Molecular Geometry

