Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
Published on: December 10, 2014
How many squat-stand manoeuvres to assess dynamic cerebral autoregulation?
S C Barnes1, N Ball1, V J Haunton2,3
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Room 210, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK.
Fewer squat-stand manoeuvres (SSMs) may suffice for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation, but a full protocol is generally recommended. This research determined the minimum SSMs needed for reliable coherence, reducing participant workload.
Area of Science:
- Physiology
- Neurology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Squat-stand manoeuvres (SSMs) are utilized to assess dynamic cerebral autoregulation by inducing blood pressure (BP) changes.
- However, SSMs are physically demanding, posing challenges for older individuals and limiting the number of repetitions possible.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the minimum number of SSMs required to achieve satisfactory coherence for reliable dynamic cerebral autoregulation assessment.
- To minimize the physical workload for participants, particularly older adults.
Main Methods:
- Twenty subjects performed SSMs at 0.05 Hz, with measurements including end-tidal CO2, cerebral blood flow velocity, heart rate, BP, and squat depth.
- Transfer function analysis was used to estimate coherence and the autoregulation index (ARI) at different numbers of SSMs (3, 6, 9, 12, 15).
Main Results:
- Coherence reached satisfactory levels (0.93 ± 0.05) after just three SSMs and peaked at 0.95 ± 0.02 after 12.
- The autoregulation index (ARI) showed a consecutive decrease with more manoeuvres, while intra-subject variability for ARI remained consistent.
- Coherence was significantly enhanced in a repeat visit, indicating improved reliability with familiarization.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that a reduced number of SSMs may be acceptable for designing protocols when participant tolerance is limited.
- However, it is emphasized that fewer manoeuvres should be used cautiously, and a full protocol is generally preferred for robust assessment.
- Further validation at a different frequency (0.10 Hz) is recommended to confirm the generalizability of these findings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation....
Standing Waves
Modes of Standing Waves - I
Modes of Standing Waves: II
For a tube open at one end and closed at the other filled with air, the modes are such that there is always an antinode at the open end and a node at the closed end....
Standing Waves in a Cavity
Standing Electromagnetic Waves
Suppose a sheet of a perfect conductor is placed in the yz-plane, and a linearly polarized electromagnetic wave traveling in the...

