Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

The Influence of Affect on Cognition01:29

The Influence of Affect on Cognition

296
Positive affect significantly influences cognitive processes, including evaluation, memory, creativity, and social judgments. Compared to negative affect, positive emotional states promote more favorable interpretations of stimuli, cognitive flexibility, and heuristic processing. These effects highlight emotions' powerful role in shaping how individuals perceive, remember, and interact with the world.Influence on Evaluation and AttributionWhen individuals experience positive affect, they are...
296
The Influence of Cognition on Affect01:29

The Influence of Cognition on Affect

221
Cognition plays a pivotal role in shaping emotional experiences, as demonstrated by Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion. According to this model, emotion arises from a combination of physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation. The body’s physiological response to stimuli is ambiguous and only gains emotional significance through cognitive labeling. For instance, an increased heart rate and adrenaline surge while standing near an attractive person may be...
221
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

37.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
37.5K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

389
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
389
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

359
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
359
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

328
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
328

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aβ-induced inference of velocity contributes to pleasant touch in interaction with visual cues.

The Journal of physiology·2026
Same author

Memories of Mark. Personal reflections by those in IFCN who worked with Mark Hallett.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

The emotional responses to the sounds of organic affective tactile gestures.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Is It Different to Touch Oneself Than to Touch Others? A Scientific Journey with Vincent Hayward.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Early insights into eyeblink conditioning using optically pumped magnetometer-based MEG.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025
Same author

Do explicit self-reflection traits relate to implicit bodily self-consciousness? Insights from asynchronous stimulation in embodiment illusions.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.4K

Does Proprioception Influence Human Spatial Cognition? A Study on Individuals With Massive Deafferentation.

Alix G Renault1, Malika Auvray2, Gaetan Parseihian3

  • 1Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.

Frontiers in Psychology
|August 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Proprioception influences the speed of using spatial mental models. While one individual without proprioception showed deficits, another performed better, suggesting complex interactions between sensory input and spatial cognition.

Keywords:
mental modelproprioceptionreference framesensory neuropathyspace representation

More Related Videos

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

7.1K
A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
07:42

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

Published on: March 3, 2018

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.4K
Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

7.1K
A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception
07:42

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

Published on: March 3, 2018

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Spatial cognition relies on mental models represented in egocentric or allocentric reference frames.
  • Sensory experiences, particularly vision, are known to influence reference frame preference.
  • The role of proprioception in shaping spatial mental models remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of proprioception on human spatial cognition.
  • To compare spatial model formation and usage in individuals deprived of proprioception versus controls.
  • To examine how proprioceptive deficits impact egocentric and allocentric reference frame utilization.

Main Methods:

  • Studied two individuals with chronic proprioceptive deprivation (GL, IW) and healthy controls.
  • Assessed spatial model formation and use via verbal descriptions, a distance-comparison task, and a free-recall task.
  • Evaluated visuo-spatial imagery using the Minnesota Paper Form Board Test.

Main Results:

  • One deafferented individual (GL) made more errors; the other (IW) made fewer errors than controls.
  • Both deafferented individuals were slower and had more variable reaction times on average.
  • GL, but not IW, showed impaired visuo-spatial imagery compared to controls.

Conclusions:

  • Proprioception appears to influence the time required to utilize spatial representations.
  • Visuo-spatial abilities, independent of proprioception, can affect the accuracy of spatial representations.
  • Individual differences in deafferented participants highlight the complex interplay of sensory systems in spatial cognition.