Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Removal of subcutaneous defibrillator shocking coils: Lessons to learn for future extraction of subcutaneous
Shady Nakhla1, Ayman A Hussein1, Michael P Brunner1
1Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Background:
Subcutaneous shocking coils (SQC) have been used to lower defibrillation thresholds in certain patient populations. There are limited data regarding the extraction complexity of these leads. The goal of this study is to describe our SQC extraction experience and identify challenges that may be of importance with the increase in utilization and extraction of fully subcutaneous defibrillator systems.
Methods:
We studied consecutive patients who underwent lead removal at our institution during which a Medtronic 6996SQ (Medtronic plc, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was removed RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (54.5 ± 14 years, 85.7% male) underwent procedures where at least one lead removed was a SQC. Mean ejection fraction was 27.7% and 11 patients had prior ventricular arrhythmia. Median SQC age was 177 days and the age of the oldest SQC removed was 3,041 days. Infection was the indication for removal in 14 patients. One removal was performed surgically and 20 were completed percutaneously. Three procedures required additional incisions beyond the device pocket and tie-down sleeve to complete the SQC lead removal due to dense adhesions. One removal procedure required the use of a laser sheath to relieve fibrosis. Complications in this group did not appear related to SQC removal.
Conclusions:
Drawing from our SQC removal experience, there may be a need for additional incisions and extra tools to complete removal of older subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.
Related Concept Videos
Shock Waves
When the source's speed approaches the speed of sound, constructive interference between successive wavefronts emitted by the source occurs immediately behind it. Initially, scientists believed that this constructive interference would result in such high...
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Second Order systems II
First Order Systems
When a first-order system is subjected to a unit-step input, its response is characterized by its transfer function. By applying the Laplace transform of the unit-step input to the transfer function, expanding the...
Second Order systems I
By reinterpreting the system, one can derive the closed-loop transfer function, which...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...

