Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Measurement of Aggregate Cohesion by Tissue Surface Tensiometry
Published on: April 8, 2011
Comparison of Approaches for Aggregating Quality Measures in Population-based Payment Models
Alex McDowell1, Christina A Nguyen2, Michael E Chernew2
1Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Objective:
To assess the impact of alternative methods of aggregating individual quality measures on Accountable Care Organization (ACO) overall scores.
Data Source:
2014 quality scores for Medicare ACOs.
Study Design:
We compare ACO overall scores derived using CMS' aggregation approach to those derived using alternative approaches to grouping and weighting measures.
Principal Findings:
Alternative grouping and weighting methods based on statistical criteria produced overall quality scores similar to those produced using CMS' approach (κ = 0.80 to 0.95). Scores derived from giving specific domains greater weight were less similar (κ = 0.51 to 0.93).
Conclusions:
How measures are grouped into domains and how these domains are weighted to generate overall scores can have important implications for ACO's shared savings payments.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
What is Population Genetics?
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Conservation of Small Populations
Population Growth
What are Populations and Communities?

