Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Employing Green-Chemistry Principles for Safe and Sustainable Synthesis of Biodiesels
Published on: April 19, 2024
Evaluation of a gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow system on hazardous sterile product preparation
Patricia A Roberts1, Ian R Willoughby2, Nathan Barnes3
1Cleveland Clinic Euclid Hospital, Euclid, OH.
Purpose:
The impact of a gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow (TAWF) system on hazardous compounded sterile product (CSP) production time, staff perception of safety, and job satisfaction was evaluated.
Methods:
For 2 weeks before implementation of a gravimetric-based TAWF, staff utilized an automated punch clock to document the time to prepare and check CSPs compounded volumetrically. Simultaneously, an anonymous, online survey was e-mailed to staff to evaluate their perceptions regarding the safety of volumetric preparation and satisfaction with their role preparing CSPs. At 30 and 90 days postimplementation of the TAWF, staff completed identical follow-up surveys to evaluate safety and satisfaction using the gravimetric-based TAWF. The TAWF software captured product preparation and check times postimplementation. Data regarding the accuracy of compounding were collected postimplementation and compared to accuracy data available in the published literature.
Results:
The median time to prepare CSPs preimplementation (n = 643) was 445 seconds versus 359 seconds (n = 728) 90 days after implementation of the gravimetric-based TAWF (p < 0.001). The median time to review and check CSPs was 45 seconds before implementation and 19 seconds 90 days after implementation (p < 0.01). Survey respondents preferred to use the TAWF to compound CSPs over volumetric preparation. There was no difference in respondents' perception of safety and accuracy of the TAWF preimplementation versus postimplementation.
Conclusion:
The gravimetric-based TAWF preparation of hazardous CSPs was faster and more accurate than manual volumetric preparation and improved staff perception regarding the accuracy of the CSP preparation process.
More Related Videos
07:05Author Spotlight: Eco-Friendly Extraction of Bioactive Compounds Using Polyol-Based Microwave-Assisted Techniques
Published on: August 23, 2024
06:24Generic Protocol for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Production Using Automated Microbioreactor Technology
Published on: December 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Rate
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Hybridoma Technology
Hybridoma Selection
Commonly used fusion techniques — electroporation,...