Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dehydration Synthesis01:15

Dehydration Synthesis

149.9K
Overview
Dehydration synthesis (also called a condensation reaction) is the chemical process in which two molecules covalently link together to form a new molecule, along with the release of a water molecule. Many physiologically important compounds form by dehydration synthesis reactions, such as complex carbohydrates, proteins, DNA, and RNA.
Synthesis of carbohydrates
Sugar molecules are covalently linked together by dehydration synthesis. During the reaction, the hydroxyl (-OH) group from...
149.9K
Synthesis and Decomposition Reactions02:17

Synthesis and Decomposition Reactions

38.3K
Synthesis and decomposition are two types of redox reactions. Synthesis means to make something, whereas decomposition means to break something. The reactions are accompanied by chemical and energy changes. 
38.3K
Lagging Strand Synthesis01:59

Lagging Strand Synthesis

61.4K
During replication, the complementary strands in double-stranded DNA are synthesized at different rates. Replication first begins on the leading strand. Replication starts later, occurs more slowly, and proceeds discontinuously on the lagging strand.
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...
61.4K
Protein Complex Assembly02:41

Protein Complex Assembly

16.8K
Proteins can form homomeric complexes with another unit of the same protein or heteromeric complexes with different types.  Most protein complexes self-assemble spontaneously via ordered pathways, while some proteins need assembly factors that guide their proper assembly. Despite the crowded intracellular environment, proteins usually interact with their correct partners and form functional complexes.
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
16.8K
Transfer RNA Synthesis02:36

Transfer RNA Synthesis

13.4K
One of the unique features of tRNA is the presence of modified bases. In some tRNAs, modified bases account for nearly 20% of the total bases in the molecule. Altogether, these unusual bases protect the tRNA from enzymatic degradation by RNases.
Each of these chemical modifications is carried by a specific enzyme, post-transcription. All of these enzymes have unique base and site-specificity. Methylation, the most common chemical modification, is carried by at least nine different enzymes, with...
13.4K
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

2.9K
Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multinuclear uranium-nitrogen cluster formation from exploration of organouranium-ammonolysis.

Communications chemistry·2026
Same author

Unexpected dispersion-stabilized tris(terphenylthiolate) complexes, Ln(SAr <sup><i>i</i>Pr6</sup>)<sub>3</sub>, arising from two-electron reduction by Ln(SAr <sup><i>i</i>Pr6</sup>)<sub>2</sub> [Ar <sup><i>i</i>Pr6</sup> = C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>2</sub>-2,6,4- <sup><i>i</i></sup> Pr<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>].

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Isolable Cuprocenes: Bis(tri-<i>tert</i>-butylcyclopentadienyl) Complexes of Copper.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

<i>In crystallo</i> homolytic cleavage of a terminal lanthanum(III)-methyl bond by Cu Kα X-radiation forms a La(II) complex.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2025
Same author

On the Use of Ce[N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>3</sub>(THF)<sub><i>n</i></sub> in Catalysis.

Inorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

Flash Communication: Ti-Catalyzed "Interrupted" Cascading Hydroamination of 1,6- and 1,7-En-ynes.

Organometallics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Comparison of Two Different Synthesis Methods of Single Crystals of Superconducting Uranium Ditelluride
04:51

Comparison of Two Different Synthesis Methods of Single Crystals of Superconducting Uranium Ditelluride

Published on: July 8, 2021

3.2K

Synthesis of uranium-in-cryptand complexes.

Daniel N Huh1, Cory J Windorff, Joseph W Ziller

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA. wevans@uci.edu.

Chemical Communications (Cambridge, England)
|August 25, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Researchers easily encapsulated uranium (U) and lanthanum (La) using 2.2.2-cryptand. This process yielded crystallographically characterized complexes, demonstrating a straightforward method for synthesizing these metal-cryptand compounds.

More Related Videos

Methods for Analyzing the Impacts of Natural Uranium on In Vitro Osteoclastogenesis
09:51

Methods for Analyzing the Impacts of Natural Uranium on In Vitro Osteoclastogenesis

Published on: January 30, 2018

8.5K
Separation of Uranium and Thorium for 230Th-U Dating of Submarine Hydrothermal Sulfides
08:43

Separation of Uranium and Thorium for 230Th-U Dating of Submarine Hydrothermal Sulfides

Published on: May 20, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Comparison of Two Different Synthesis Methods of Single Crystals of Superconducting Uranium Ditelluride
04:51

Comparison of Two Different Synthesis Methods of Single Crystals of Superconducting Uranium Ditelluride

Published on: July 8, 2021

3.2K
Methods for Analyzing the Impacts of Natural Uranium on In Vitro Osteoclastogenesis
09:51

Methods for Analyzing the Impacts of Natural Uranium on In Vitro Osteoclastogenesis

Published on: January 30, 2018

8.5K
Separation of Uranium and Thorium for 230Th-U Dating of Submarine Hydrothermal Sulfides
08:43

Separation of Uranium and Thorium for 230Th-U Dating of Submarine Hydrothermal Sulfides

Published on: May 20, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Coordination Chemistry
  • Lanthanide and Actinide Chemistry

Background:

  • 2.2.2-cryptand is a macrocyclic ligand known for its ability to encapsulate metal ions.
  • Uranium (U) and Lanthanum (La) are important f-block elements with diverse chemical properties.
  • Simple and efficient synthesis routes for metal complexes are crucial for further research and applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a facile method for the encapsulation of Uranium(III) and Lanthanum(III) ions.
  • To synthesize and characterize novel metal-cryptand complexes.
  • To investigate the behavior of Uranium(III)-cryptand complexes in the presence of water.

Main Methods:

  • Reaction of UI3 and LaCl3 with 2.2.2-cryptand (crypt).
  • Crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis to characterize the resulting complexes.
  • Isolation and characterization of aquo adducts in the presence of water.

Main Results:

  • Successfully synthesized and crystallographically characterized [U(crypt)I2]I and [La(crypt)Cl2]Cl complexes.
  • Demonstrated the facile encapsulation of U(III) and La(III) using simple starting materials and 2.2.2-cryptand.
  • Isolated U(III)-aquo adducts, [U(crypt)I(OH2)][I]2 and [U(crypt)I(OH2)][I][BPh4], in the presence of water.

Conclusions:

  • The 2.2.2-cryptand ligand provides an effective means for the facile encapsulation of U(III) and La(III) ions.
  • The synthetic strategy is versatile and allows for the formation of well-defined metal complexes.
  • Uranium(III)-cryptand complexes exhibit interesting behavior in aqueous environments, forming stable aquo adducts.