Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026
Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation
Published on: July 16, 2016
Effects of pregnancy on lumbar motion patterns and muscle responses
Gemma Biviá-Roig1, Juan Francisco Lisón2, Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga3
1Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Calle Ramón y Cajal s/n, Alfara del Patriarca, 46115 Valencia, Spain.
Background Context:
The kinematics of the lumbar region and the activation patterns of the erector spinae muscle have been associated with the genesis of low back pain, which is one of the most common complications associated with pregnancy. Despite the high prevalence of pregnancy-related low back pain, the biomechanical adaptations of the lumbar region during pregnancy remain unknown.
Purpose:
This study analyzes lumbar spine motion and the activation pattern of the lumbar erector spinae muscle in healthy pregnant women.
Study Design:
A case-control study.
Patient Sample:
The study involved 34 nulliparous women (control group) and 34 pregnant women in the third trimester (week 36 ± 1).
Outcome Measures:
We recorded the parameters of angular displacement of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane during trunk flexion-extension, and the EMG activity of the erector spinae muscles during flexion, extension, eccentric and concentric contractions, and the myolectrical silence.
Methods:
The participants performed several series of trunk flexion-extension movements, which were repeated 2 months postpartum. The position of the lumbar spine was recorded using an electromagnetic motion capture system. EMG activity was recorded by a surface EMG system and expressed as a percentage of a submaximal reference contraction.
Results:
Antepartum measurements showed a decrease (relative to control and postpartum measurements) in lumbar maximum flexion (52.5 ± 10.5° vs 57.3 ± 7.7° and 58.7 ± 8.6°; p < .01), the percentage of lumbar flexion during forward bending (56.4 ± 5.6% vs 59.4 ± 6.8% and 59.7 ± 5.6%; p < .01), and the time keeping maximum levels of lumbar flexion (35.7 ± 6.7% vs 43.8 ± 5.3% and 50.1 ± 3.7%; p < .01). Higher levels of erector spinae activation were observed in pregnant women during forward bending (10.1 ± 4.8% vs 6.3 ± 2.4% and 6.6 ± 2.7%; p < .01) and eccentric contraction (12.1 ± 5.2% vs 9.4 ± 3.1% and 9.1 ± 2.9%; p < .01), as well as a shortened erector spinae myoelectric silence during flexion.
Conclusions:
Pregnant women show adaptations in their patterns of lumbar motion and erector spinae activity during trunk flexion-extension. These changes could be associated with the genesis of pregnancy-related low back pain, by means of biomechanical protection mechanisms against the increase on abdominal mass and ligamentous laxity.
Related Concept Videos
01:14Design Example: Frog Muscle Response
When the switch connecting the RL circuit is closed, a brief muscle contraction is observed. This is because, at a steady state, the inductor acts like a short...
01:21Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
01:06Fixed Action Patterns
01:22Equation of Motion: General Plane motion
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...
01:24Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
01:16Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving
The friction between the roller and the ground is characterized by two coefficients. The static friction coefficient is 0.15, while the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.1. These values are crucial in understanding the interaction between...