Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
On the Unlikely Case of an Error-Free Principal Component From a Set of Fallible Measures
Tenko Raykov1, George A Marcoulides2, Tenglong Li1
1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Abstract:
This note extends the results in the 2016 article by Raykov, Marcoulides, and Li to the case of correlated errors in a set of observed measures subjected to principal component analysis. It is shown that when at least two measures are fallible, the probability is zero for any principal component-and in particular for the first principal component-to be error-free. In conjunction with the findings in Raykov et al., it is concluded that in practice no principal component can be perfectly reliable for a set of observed variables that are not all free of measurement error, whether or not their error terms correlate, and hence no principal component can practically be error-free.
More Related Videos
11:31Rapid Fractionation and Isolation of Whole Blood Components in Samples Obtained from a Community-based Setting
Published on: November 30, 2015
06:50O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression
Published on: November 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Principal Stresses in a Beam
Analyzing principal stresses is crucial, especially in...
Principal Moments of Area
The principal moment of inertia axes are the...
Principal Stresses
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Principal Stresses: Problem Solving