Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Single Port Donor Nephrectomy
Published on: March 12, 2011
KIR Donor Selection: Feasibility in Identifying better Donors.
Daniel Weisdorf1, Sarah Cooley1, Tao Wang2
1Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Selecting unrelated donors with killer cell immunoglobulin-type receptor (KIR) B haplotypes improves outcomes for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) transplants. Increasing the number of donors genotyped for KIR significantly enhances the chance of finding optimal KIR B haplotype donors, without delaying transplants.
Area of Science:
- Immunogenetics
- Hematology
- Transplantation Immunology
Background:
- Previous research indicated that acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) transplants utilizing killer cell immunoglobulin-type receptor (KIR) B haplotype better or best unrelated donors (URDs) are associated with reduced relapse rates and improved survival.
- The clinical utility of KIR genotyping in donor selection for AML remains an area of active investigation, necessitating prospective evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of centralized donor KIR genotyping in selecting optimal donors for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) searches.
- To determine the impact of KIR genotyping on donor selection success rates and transplantation timelines.
- To assess the feasibility of incorporating KIR genotyping into routine donor selection protocols.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a prospective trial involving 535 AML searches across 14 centers, with centralized donor KIR genotyping for donor selection.
- Collected data on the number of donors requested for KIR genotyping per search and the time to report KIR genotype results.
- Analyzed the proportion of KIR better or best donors identified and the impact of KIR genotyping on the time from search to transplant.
Main Results:
- A mean of 30% of KIR better or best donors were identified across the participating centers.
- Increasing the number of donors requested for KIR genotyping per search significantly improved the likelihood of identifying KIR better or best haplotype donors.
- KIR genotyping did not delay transplantation; the time from search to transplant was identical for KIR-genotyped and non-KIR-genotyped donors.
Conclusions:
- Prospective KIR genotyping can rapidly identify favorable genotype donors for AML transplantation.
- Selecting a greater number of donors for KIR genotyping per search substantially increases the probability of finding KIR best or better donors.
- Transplant centers and donor registries should collaborate to integrate KIR genotyping and other genetic factors into donor selection protocols beyond HLA, age, and parity.
Related Concept Videos
What is Natural Selection?
Antibiotic Selection
Types of Selection
Frequency-dependent Selection
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Limits to Natural Selection

