Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

An In Vitro Caseum Binding Assay that Predicts Drug Penetration in Tuberculosis Lesions
Published on: May 8, 2017
Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge
Michail Papadourakis1, Stefano Bosisio1, Julien Michel2
1EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, Joseph Black Building, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3FJ, UK.
Abstract:
In the context of the SAMPL6 challenges, series of blinded predictions of standard binding free energies were made with the SOMD software for a dataset of 27 host-guest systems featuring two octa-acids hosts (OA and TEMOA) and a cucurbituril ring (CB8) host. Three different models were used, ModelA computes the free energy of binding based on a double annihilation technique; ModelB additionally takes into account long-range dispersion and standard state corrections; ModelC additionally introduces an empirical correction term derived from a regression analysis of SAMPL5 predictions previously made with SOMD. The performance of each model was evaluated with two different setups; buffer explicitly matches the ionic strength from the binding assays, whereas no-buffer merely neutralizes the host-guest net charge with counter-ions. ModelC/no-buffer shows the lowest mean-unsigned error for the overall dataset (MUE 1.29 < 1.39 < 1.50 kcal mol-1, 95% CI), while explicit modelling of the buffer improves significantly results for the CB8 host only. Correlation with experimental data ranges from excellent for the host TEMOA (R2 0.91 < 0.94 < 0.96), to poor for CB8 (R2 0.04 < 0.12 < 0.23). Further investigations indicate a pronounced dependence of the binding free energies on the modelled ionic strength, and variable reproducibility of the binding free energies between different simulation packages.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Nuclear Binding Energy
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes
Blind Procedures
Blinding
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Standard Electrode Potentials

