Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Stereotactic Shifts During Frame-Based Image-Guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Clinical Measurements
Sunil W Dutta1, Roman O Kowalchuk1, Daniel M Trifiletti2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Purpose:
To determine the magnitude and reason for discrepancies between frame- and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-determined stereotactic coordinates, we reviewed frame-based Gamma Knife radiosurgery procedures in which CBCT was performed before treatment.
Methods And Materials:
Clinical and treatment documentation was reviewed for 150 frame placements for which stereotactic coordinates were defined via both frame and fiducials on computed tomography imaging and CBCT. Treatment planning system-reported rotational and translational differences and standard deviations (SDs) between frame-based and CBCT-based stereotactic coordinates were recorded. Potential clinical predictors for increased differences were collected. Multiple linear regressions were performed to evaluate for associations with increased translations and rotations.
Results:
The absolute mean of the measured pitch, yaw, and roll shifts was 0.14 degrees (range -0.71-0.63 degrees, SD 0.19 degrees), 0.16 degrees (range -0.50 to 0.83 degrees, SD 0.21 degrees), and 0.12 degrees (range 0.37-0.51 degrees, SD 0.15 degrees), respectively. The absolute mean of the measured shifts in the left-right, anteroposterior, and superior-inferior direction was 0.29 mm (range -1.29 to 0.82 mm, SD 0.35 mm), 0.24 mm (range -0.59 to 0.33 mm, SD 0.19 mm), and 0.24 mm (range -0.69 to 0.91 mm, SD 0.27 mm), respectively. Three cases (2.0%) exceeded 1 mm in translational difference, all in the left-right direction (1.05, 1.13, and 1.29 mm). Lower Karnofsky Performance Scale status was associated with greater translational differences (vector magnitude, P = .023) and rotation (pitch, P = .044; yaw, P = .002). Usage of longer total pin length (sum of all 4 fixation pin lengths) was associated with increased rotation but not with translation (P < .001 and P = .56, respectively).
Conclusions:
CBCT imaging in this cohort of frame-based cases suggests that the discrepancy in stereotactic coordinates is less than 1 mm or degree in most cases. Low Karnofsky Performance Scale status and longer total pin length correlate with larger differences between frame-defined and CBCT-defined stereotactic coordinates.
More Related Videos
08:02A High-Throughput Image-Guided Stereotactic Neuronavigation and Focused Ultrasound System for Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in Rodents
Published on: July 16, 2020
09:29Stereotactically-guided Ablation of the Rat Auditory Cortex, and Localization of the Lesion in the Brain
Published on: October 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Frames
Frames are versatile and widely used in various applications such as structural supports for beams and columns, automobile chassis construction, and in the construction...
Frames: Problem Solving II
Frames: Problem Solving I
Inertial Frames of Reference
Non-inertial Frames of Reference