Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Fluorescent Paper Strips for the Detection of Diesel Adulteration with Smartphone Read-out
Published on: November 9, 2018
Variable selection for multivariate classification aiming to detect individual adulterants and their blends in grape
Carolina Sheng Whei Miaw1, Marcelo Martins Sena2, Scheilla Vitorino Carvalho de Souza3
1Department of Food Science, Faculty of Pharmacy (FAFAR), Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Campus da UFMG, Pampulha, 31270-010 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, 70040-020 Brasília, DF, Brazil; Chemometrics, Qualimetric and Nanosensors Group, Department of Analytical and Organic Chemistry, Rovira i Virgili University, Marcel·lí Domingo s/n, 43007 Tarragona, Spain.
Abstract:
During the quality inspection control of fruit beverages, some types of adulterations can be detected, such as the addition or substitution with less expensive fruits. To determine whether grape nectars were adulterated by substitution with apple or cashew juice or by a mixture of both, a methodology based on attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform mid infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and multivariate classification methods was proposed. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) models were developed as multi-class methods (classes unadulterated, adulterated with cashew and adulterated with apple) with the full-spectra. PLS-DA presented better performance parameters than SIMCA in the classification of samples with just one adulterant, while poor results were achieved for samples with blends of two adulterants when using both classification methods. Three variable selection methods were tested in order to improve the effectiveness of the classification models: interval partial least squares (iPLS), variable importance in projection scores (VIP scores) and a genetic algorithm (GA). Variable selection methods improved the performance parameters for the SIMCA and PLS-DA methods when they were used to predict samples with only one adulterant. Only PLS-DA coupled with iPLS was able to classify samples with blends of two adulterants, providing sensitivity values between 100% and 83% at 100% specificity for the three studied classes.
Related Concept Videos
Aims Of Nursing
Impact of Individuals on Individuals
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
What is Natural Selection?
Graphs of Equations in Two Variables

