Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026
Enema of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Published on: January 27, 2023
Pharmacists and patients sharing decisions about medicines: Development and feasibility of a conversation guide
Kristie Rebecca Weir1, Carissa Bonner1, Kirsten McCaffery1
1Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Background:
In Australia, the Home Medicines Review (HMR) is a nationally-funded program, led by pharmacists to optimize medication use for older people. A Medicines Conversation Guide was developed for pharmacists to use in the context of a HMR. The Guide aims to increase patient involvement and support discussions about: general health understanding, decision-making and information preferences, health priorities related to medicines, patient goals and fears, views on important activities and trade-offs.
Objective:
This study describes the development and feasibility testing of a Medicines Conversation Guide in HMRs with pharmacists and older patients.
Methods:
The Guide was developed using a systematic and iterative process, followed by testing in clinical practice with 11 pharmacists, 17 patients (aged 65+) and their companions. A researcher observed HMRs, surveyed and qualitatively interviewed patients and pharmacists to discuss feasibility. Transcribed recordings of the interviews were thematically coded and a Framework Analysis method used.
Results:
Pharmacists found the Guide to be an acceptable and useful component to the HMR, especially among patients with limited knowledge of their medicines. The Guide seemed most effective when integrated with the HMR and tailored to suit the individual patient. Some questions were difficult for patients to grasp (e.g. trade-offs) or sounded formal. Most patients found the Guide focused the HMR on their perspective and encouraged a more holistic approach to the HMR. From the quantitative survey, pharmacists found the Guide easy to implement, balanced and understandable.
Conclusions:
Pharmacists and patients reported the Guide fits with the HMR encounter relatively easily and promoted communication about goals and preferences in relation to medications. This study highlighted some key challenges for communication about medicines and how the Guide may help support the process of involving patients more in the HMR.
Related Concept Videos
02:08Gene Conversion
02:08Gene Conversion
01:36Conversion of Units
The first step in the unit conversion is to list the given units and the units required...
01:20Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
01:29Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics