Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
A sequential trial effect based on the motor interference effect from dangerous objects: An ERP study
Peng Liu1, Xiaoyi Wang2, Gai Cao1
1School of Public Management, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Introduction:
This study aims to investigate whether processing a prepared response toward a dangerous object in a previous trial influences subsequent trial processing.
Methods:
The design manipulated the Go/NoGo factor of the current trial, the target dangerousness of the previous trial and that of the current trial.
Results:
In current Go trials, the behavioral results revealed a classical motor interference effect in trials that were preceded by a safe trial (a longer reaction time (RT) and a larger error rate for the previous safe and current dangerous (sD) condition than for the previous safe and current safe (sS) condition). However, the motor interference effect diminished in trials that were preceded by a dangerous trial (insignificant differences in the mean RTs and error rates between the previous dangerous and current dangerous (dD) condition and the previous dangerous and current safe (dS) condition). The event-related potential (ERP) results identified more positive P2 and parietal P3 amplitudes (indicating attentional resource allocation) for the dD condition than for the dS condition. However, the P2 and parietal P3 amplitudes of the sD condition did not significantly differ from those of the sS condition.
Discussions:
These results support the hypothesis that the avoidance motivation elicited by a dangerous target in a previous trial may indicate a dangerous situation, which leads to recruitment of more attentional resources allocated to the subsequent dangerous trial. Therefore, RTs are improved and errors are reduced in the consecutive dangerous condition, subsequently decreasing the motor interference effect in trials preceded by a dangerous trial compared with trials preceded by a safe trial. However, analysis of current NoGo trials revealed that none of the main effects or interactions reached significance in both the behavioral and ERP results, indicating that the hypothesis holds true only if the prepared response needs to be executed.
Insights
Experiencing a dangerous object in one trial enhances attention and improves performance on subsequent dangerous trials. This effect, however, only occurs when a response must be executed.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Previous research indicates that threat cues can influence cognitive processing.
- Understanding how prior exposure to danger affects subsequent responses is crucial for explaining adaptive behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of processing a prepared response to a dangerous object in a prior trial on subsequent trial processing.
- To examine the impact of sequential trial dangerousness on behavioral and neural responses.
Main Methods:
- A Go/NoGo task was employed, manipulating the dangerousness of targets in consecutive trials.
- Behavioral data (reaction time, error rate) and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded.
Main Results:
- In Go trials, a diminished motor interference effect was observed when trials preceded a dangerous target, unlike trials preceded by a safe target.
- Event-related potential data showed increased P2 and parietal P3 amplitudes for dangerous-dangerous (dD) conditions compared to dangerous-safe (dS) conditions, indicating heightened attentional resource allocation.
- No significant effects were found in NoGo trials for either behavioral or ERP measures.
Conclusions:
- Avoidance motivation from a previous dangerous target enhances attentional allocation to subsequent dangerous trials, improving performance and reducing motor interference.
- This effect is contingent on the requirement to execute a prepared response, as evidenced by the lack of significant findings in NoGo trials.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Diffraction
RNA Interference
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Velocity of an Object

