Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.5K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.5K
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.1K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.1K
Perception01:28

Perception

893
Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
893

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of Health Resource Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in Ethnic Minority Areas of Guangxi: Data from 2010 to 2022.

Risk management and healthcare policy·2025
Same author

How does abstract and concrete garbage classification signage influence waste sorting behavior?

PeerJ·2023
Same author

Arousal modulates the motor interference effect stimulated by pictures of threatening animals.

PeerJ·2021
Same author

A sequential trial effect based on the motor interference effect from dangerous objects: An ERP study.

Brain and behavior·2018
Same author

[Inhibitory effect of valproic acid on xenografted Kasumi-1 tumor growth in nude mouse and its mechanism].

Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi·2012
Same author

Effect of resistant starch film properties on the colon-targeting release of drug from coated pellets.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.7K

Increasing Perceptual Salience Diminishes the Motor Interference Effect From Dangerous Objects.

Rong Cao1,2, Gai Cao1,2, Peng Liu1,2

  • 1School of Public Management, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.

Frontiers in Psychology
|April 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary

The motor interference effect from dangerous objects is not due to response inhibition. Making dangerous objects red reduces this effect by increasing attentional resources and speeding up reactions.

Keywords:
colordangerous objectmotor interference effectmotor priming paradigmperceptual salience

More Related Videos

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.6K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.7K
An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.6K
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Dangerous objects can interfere with motor actions, slowing responses (motor interference effect).
  • The origin of this effect, particularly whether it involves response inhibition, is debated.
  • Perceptual salience might influence the processing of dangerous objects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects.
  • To examine if increasing perceptual salience (e.g., object color) modulates this effect.
  • To explore the role of attentional resources and feature detection in processing dangerous stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • A shape categorization task was used with target objects varying in color (gray/red) and dangerousness (safe/dangerous).
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) including N2, P2, and P3 amplitudes were recorded.
  • Behavioral data (reaction times) were analyzed alongside ERP components.

Main Results:

  • Null effect in N2 amplitudes between dangerous and safe conditions ruled out response inhibition as the origin.
  • The motor interference effect was present for gray targets but diminished for red targets.
  • Red targets elicited more positive P2 and frontal P3 amplitudes, indicating enhanced feature detection and attentional recruitment.
  • Parietal P3 amplitudes showed a greater difference between dangerous and safe conditions for gray targets compared to red targets.

Conclusions:

  • The motor interference effect does not stem from response inhibition.
  • Increased perceptual salience (red color) facilitates processing of dangerous objects by allocating more attentional resources.
  • Enhanced attention to salient red targets accelerates reactions, diminishing the interference effect.