Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Murine AAA Model Using Elastase to Mimic Human Aneurysms
Published on: July 26, 2024
Strongly Coupled Morphological Features of Aortic Aneurysms Drive Intraluminal Thrombus
D Bhagavan1, P Di Achille1, J D Humphrey2,3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract:
Over 75% of abdominal aortic aneurysms harbor an intraluminal thrombus, and increasing evidence suggests that biologically active thrombus contributes to the natural history of these potentially lethal lesions. Thrombus formation depends on the local hemodynamics, which in turn depends on morphological features of the aneurysm and near vasculature. We previously presented a hemodynamically motivated "thrombus formation potential" that predicts where and when thrombus might form. Herein, we combine detailed studies of the three-dimensional hemodynamics with methods of sparse grid collocation and interpolation via kriging to examine roles of five key morphological features of aneurysms on thrombus formation: lesion diameter, axial position, length, curvature, and renal artery position. Computational simulations suggest that maximum diameter is a key determinant of thrombogenicity, but other morphological features modulate this dependence. More distally located lesions tend to have a higher thrombus formation potential and shorter lesions tend to have a higher potential than longer lesions, given the same aneurysmal dilatation. Finally, movement of vortical structures through the infrarenal aorta and lesion can significantly affect thrombogenicity. Formation of intraluminal thrombus within an evolving abdominal aortic aneurysm thus depends on coupled morphological features, not all intuitive, and computational simulations can be useful for predicting thrombogenesis.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Energy to Drive Translocation
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...

