Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Methods for Acute and Subacute Murine Hindlimb Ischemia
Published on: June 21, 2016
Contemporary trends and outcomes of thrombolytic therapy for acute lower extremity ischemia
Jonathan Bath1, Ryan J Kim1, Viktor Y Dombrovskiy2
11 Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, USA.
Insights
Thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia increased in use, with combined endovascular procedures showing better outcomes. Thrombolysis alone had higher mortality and stroke risks, while open surgery after failed thrombolysis led to more amputations and complications.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a critical vascular emergency demanding prompt treatment.
- Thrombolysis is a common intervention for ALI, but its contemporary application and outcomes require analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze current trends, outcomes, and complications associated with thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia.
- To compare outcomes across different thrombolysis strategies: alone, with endovascular procedures, or after failed thrombolysis requiring open surgery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2013) using ICD-9 codes.
- Identification of patients undergoing emergency thrombolysis for ALI.
- Stratification into three groups: thrombolysis alone, thrombolysis plus endovascular procedure (T+ENDO), and failed thrombolysis requiring open surgery (T+OPEN).
Main Results:
- Thrombolysis utilization for ALI increased from 16.8% to 24.2% (p<0.0001) during the study period.
- The T+ENDO group became the most common (47.8% by 2013), showing significantly lower mortality (3.2%) and stroke rates (1.2%) compared to thrombolysis alone (6.1% mortality, 3.0% stroke).
- The T+OPEN group had the highest amputation (11.6%) and complication rates (cardiac, respiratory, renal, pneumonia, fasciotomy).
Conclusions:
- Thrombolysis remains a vital and increasingly used treatment for ALI, with combined endovascular approaches improving outcomes.
- Thrombolysis alone is associated with higher mortality and stroke risks.
- Optimal patient selection for initial thrombolysis versus immediate open surgery remains a significant clinical challenge, as evidenced by the 25% of patients requiring open procedures.
Objective:
Acute limb ischemia is a common vascular emergency requiring immediate intervention. Thrombolysis has been widely utilized for acute limb ischemia; the purpose of this study is to analyze contemporary trends, outcomes and complications of thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia.
Methods:
Patients were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2013) using ICD-9. Patients undergoing emergency thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia were evaluated. Three groups were analyzed: thrombolysis alone, thrombolysis and endovascular procedure (T+ENDO), and failed thrombolysis requiring open surgery (T+OPEN).
Results:
A total of 162,240 patients with acute limb ischemia were estimated: 33,615 patients (20.7%) underwent thrombolysis as the initial treatment. Mean age was 66.2 ± 34.9 years with 54% male. The utilization of thrombolysis increased significantly during the study period (16.8-24.2%, p < 0.0001). The most common group was thrombolysis and endovascular procedure (40.7%), followed by thrombolysis alone (34.1%), and T+OPEN (25.2%). Thrombolysis and endovascular procedure increased significantly over time (31.6-47.8%, p < 0.0001) whereas thrombolysis alone and T+OPEN significantly decreased (39.6-28.6% and 28.7-23.6%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Overall mortality was 4.9%; thrombolysis and endovascular procedure compared to thrombolysis alone and T-OPEN had a lower mortality rate (3.2% vs. 6.1% and 5.9%, p < 0001). The overall stroke rate was 1.9%; thrombolysis alone had the highest stroke rate (3.0%, p < 0.0001) with thrombolysis and endovascular procedure the lowest (1.2%) and T+OPEN 1.7%. The highest amputation rate was T+OPEN (11.6%, p < 0.001) compared to thrombolysis and endovascular procedure (5.1%) and thrombolysis alone (5.3%). T+OPEN had the highest incidence of cardiac (5.5%), respiratory (7.3%) and renal complications (12.5%), pneumonia (4.0%), and fasciotomy (16.8%) (all p < 0.0001).
Conclusion:
Thrombolysis remains an effective treatment for acute limb ischemia with increased utilization over time. There was a significant increase in thrombolysis and endovascular procedure leading to improved outcomes. Thrombolysis alone carried the highest mortality and stroke rate, with T+OPEN associated with the highest amputation and complications. Although thrombolysis is effective, 25% of patients required an open procedure suggesting that patient selection for thrombolysis first instead of open surgery continues to be a clinical challenge.
More Related Videos
14:19Primary Outcome Assessment in a Pig Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published on: October 14, 2016
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Contemporary Psychology
Biopsychology
Biopsychology, also known as biological psychology or behavioral neuroscience, focuses on the biological underpinnings of behavior and mental processes. It...
Current Trends in Nursing I
Current Trends in Nursing II
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...