Single Session Bilateral Vs Staged Bilateral Ureteroscopy for Nephrolithiasis: An Assessment of Safety and Efficacy

To compare outcomes of patients undergoing single session bilateral ureteroscopy (SSBU) to those undergoing planned staged ureteroscopy (URS) for bilateral nephrolithiasis. While SSBU has the advantage of 1 anesthetic procedure, some may pursue a staged approach due to the potential higher risk of complications and patient discomfort with 2 ureteral stents.

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing SSBU and planned staged URS for nephrolithiasis between December 2007 and December 2014. Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative outcomes were compared. Stone burden was calculated as cumulative stone diameter. Residual stone fragments were defined as any stone visible on postoperative imaging.

Sixty-three patients underwent SSBU and 37 underwent planned staged URS. Both cohorts had a relatively large cumulative stone burden (30.9 mm vs 32.4 mm, P = .71). Total operative time was significantly longer for planned staged URS (139 vs 86 minutes, P <.0001). There were no significant differences in complications or emergency room visits between the 2 cohorts despite bilateral ureteral stents being placed in the majority of the SSBU cohort (73%). There were no differences in stone-free rates or the need for additional procedures.

SSBU is safe and effective with overall shorter operative times and similar stone-free rates compared to planned staged URS. Bilateral ureteral stent placement did not increase the rate of unplanned emergency visits. For patients with bilateral nephrolithiasis, urologists should strongly consider SSBU to limit anesthetic exposure, overall operative time, and health care costs.