Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

10:42
Subculture and Cryopreservation of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Organoids: Pros and Cons for Single Cell Digestion
Published on: July 6, 2022
4.2K
Pros and cons of using ORBEYE™ for microneurosurgery
Satoshi Takahashi1, Masahiro Toda1, Masaaki Nishimoto1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
|September 15, 2018
Summary
The ORBEYE™ microscope offers space-saving benefits and comfortable positioning for microneurosurgery. While advantageous, its rotated view presents challenges for assistant surgeons, suggesting it as a complementary tool for conventional microscopy.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Surgical Technology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Microneurosurgery requires advanced visualization tools.
- Conventional binocular microscopes are the current standard but have limitations.
- New technologies aim to improve surgical workflow and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the novel ORBEYE™ microscope in microneurosurgery.
- To compare ORBEYE™ with the traditional binocular microscope.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective assessment of 14 microneurosurgical procedures using ORBEYE™.
- Evaluation by nine neurosurgeons using a 20-question questionnaire.
- Analysis of surgeon experience impact on ORBEYE™ perception.
Main Results:
- ORBEYE™ scored highest for ease of setup and space-saving features.
- Comfortable operating position and space-saving were key benefits.
- Ease of operation for the assistant surgeon was rated lowest due to a rotated view.
- Experienced users reported significantly higher satisfaction.
Conclusions:
- ORBEYE™ offers benefits like compact size and no need for eye-lens focusing.
- Disadvantages include a rotated view for the assistant surgeon.
- ORBEYE™ can be a valuable adjunct to conventional microscopes and may enhance future microneurosurgery.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
10.5K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.5K
Social Exchange Theory
40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K

