Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition
Published on: July 13, 2019
A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing
Yanshan Wang1, Sijia Liu1, Naveed Afzal1
1Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Evaluating word embeddings from clinical notes and biomedical literature shows they better capture medical term semantics than general corpora. Performance varies across tasks, but embeddings improve most applications.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Machine Learning
- Computational Linguistics
Background:
- Word embeddings are crucial for capturing semantic relationships in biomedical NLP.
- Existing research often uses diverse corpora like Wikipedia or biomedical literature for training.
- Limited evaluation exists for word embeddings trained on different textual resources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically evaluate and compare word embeddings trained from diverse corpora.
- To assess the performance of embeddings from clinical notes, biomedical publications, Wikipedia, and news.
- To understand the impact of training data on the semantic capabilities of word embeddings.
Main Methods:
- Trained word embeddings using electronic health record (EHR) data and PubMed Central (MedLit) articles.
- Utilized pre-trained GloVe and Google News embeddings for comparison.
- Conducted qualitative analysis (similarity inspection, visualization) and quantitative evaluation (intrinsic semantic similarity, extrinsic downstream tasks like information extraction).
Main Results:
- Embeddings from EHR and MedLit demonstrated superior ability in identifying semantically similar medical terms compared to GloVe and Google News.
- Intrinsic evaluation confirmed EHR embeddings closely align with human expert judgments on medical semantic similarity.
- Extrinsic evaluation showed EHR embeddings achieved the highest F1 score (0.900) for clinical information extraction, while Google News embeddings excelled in relation extraction (0.790).
Conclusions:
- Word embeddings trained on biomedical domain corpora (EHR, MedLit) better capture medical term semantics and align with expert judgment.
- No single word embedding model consistently outperforms others across all biomedical NLP tasks; however, their inclusion as features generally enhances performance.
- Biomedical domain-specific embeddings do not always outperform general domain embeddings in downstream biomedical NLP tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
What is Natural Selection?
Components of Language
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language and Cognition
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

