Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

06:46
Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder
Published on: June 7, 2024
1.4K
Improving the measurement of group-level constructs by optimizing between-group differentiation
Paul D Bliese1, Mark A Maltarich1, Jonathan L Hendricks1
1Management Department.
The Journal of Applied Psychology
|September 18, 2018
Summary
Researchers can improve group-level analyses by validating measurement scales using item-level intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(1)). This method enhances the scale's ability to differentiate between groups, boosting predictive validity.
Area of Science:
- Multilevel modeling
- Psychometrics
- Quantitative psychology
Background:
- Group-level constructs are often measured by aggregating individual responses to multi-item scales.
- Current validation practices for group-level constructs may not effectively differentiate between groups.
- Existing validation methods primarily use procedures designed for individual-level constructs, potentially missing item-level group differentiation information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate current measurement validation practices for group-level constructs.
- To propose an enhanced validation approach incorporating item-level group differentiation.
- To demonstrate the utility of item-level intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(1)) in improving group-level scale validation.
Main Methods:
- A 10-year review of multilevel articles in top journals was conducted.
- Previously published datasets were re-analyzed.
- Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(1)) was calculated for each scale item.
Main Results:
- Current validation practices for group-level constructs may be suboptimal for differentiating groups.
- Item-level ICC(1) estimates provide unique information not captured by traditional methods.
- Utilizing item-level ICC(1) can lead to group-level scales with higher ICC(1) values.
- Enhanced scales demonstrate improved predictive validity.
Conclusions:
- Group-level measurement validation should be augmented with item-level group differentiation information.
- Researchers should supplement conventional validation with item-level ICC(1) values.
- This approach enhances the development and modification of scales for assessing group-level constructs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Differential Leveling
718
Differential leveling is a precise method in surveying used to determine the elevation difference between two points. Its primary goal is to establish accurate vertical measurements to create level surfaces or grade lines critical for designing and constructing infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and buildings.The procedure for differential leveling begins with setting up and leveling the instrument at a point where the benchmark can be seen. The level rod is held on the benchmark (BM), and...
718
Ratio Level of Measurement
21.5K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
21.5K
Ordinal Level of Measurement
33.9K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
33.9K
Interval Level of Measurement
19.1K
For effective statistical analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
19.1K
Nominal Level of Measurement
39.0K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. Not every statistical operation can be used with every set of data. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
39.0K
Leveling Effect
1.4K
In acid-base chemistry, the leveling effect refers to the limitation imposed by the solvent on the strength of acids and bases in solution. When a base stronger than the solvent's conjugate base is used, it deprotonates the solvent until the base is entirely consumed, making it ineffective against weaker acids. Conversely, an acid stronger than the solvent's conjugate acid protonates the solvent until the acid is depleted, rendering it ineffective against weaker bases. Essentially, the...
1.4K

