Physical examination to screen for peripheral artery disease in a defined Primary Care population: A diagnostic
Ángel Herráiz-Adillo1,2, Olga Piñar-Serrano1, Julián Ángel Mariana-Herráiz2
1Department of Primary Care, Health Service of Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM), Tragacete, Cuenca, Spain.
Introduction:
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an underdiagnosed prevalent disease which implies high cardiovascular risk. Professionals usually depend on physical examination to screen for PAD.
Objective:
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination to screen for PAD in a rural Primary Care population and to evaluate the nurse-physician level of agreement in pedal pulse palpation.
Methods:
Diagnostic accuracy study in which two experienced professionals (physician-nurse) prospectively performed pedal pulse palpation (grading as absent, reduced, normal, or bounding), femoral bruit auscultation and calf circumference (index tests) comparing with Doppler ABI (reference test, positive cut-off: 0.9 ≥ ABI ≥ 1.4) in 158 consecutive subjects.
Inclusion Criteria:
presence of diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, smoking habit (current or former), or age ≥ 65.
Results:
Of 315 legs included, PAD was confirmed in 38 (12.1%) legs. Absent dorsalis pedis (DP) and posterior tibial (PT) pulses were found in 37 (11.7%) and 67 (21.3%) legs, respectively. Regarding nurse evaluation, when a positive test was set if DP or PT were absent (more sensitive cut-off), sensitivity was = 86.8 (95% CI: 74.8-98.9), specificity = 82.7 (95% CI: 78.0-87.3), likelihood ratio+ = 5.01 (95% CI: 3.77-6.67), likelihood ratio- = 0.16 (95% CI: 0.07-0.36), and diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) = 31.5 (95% CI: 11.7-84.8). Age, diabetes, and calcification (ABI ≥ 1.4) influenced the rate of a false negative finding in pedal palpation. Physician-nurse weighted kappa coefficient was = 0.649 (95% CI: 0.599-0.699). The presence of a femoral bruit auscultation had a dOR = 3.8 (95% CI: 1.1-13.1), and a calf circumference <34.55 cm had a dOR = 3.2 (95% CI: 1.6-6.4).
Conclusions And Relevance:
In a mainly asymptomatic Primary Care population, pedal pulse palpation was by far the best diagnostic test, with good diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater agreement. In view of a high sensitivity and capacity to rule out the disease, pedal pulse palpation could be performed as a screening test for PAD and individuals at high cardiovascular risk.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
03:40Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
Published on: January 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
