Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Margin of Error

Margin of Error

The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.

What are Estimates?

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates.
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Rediscovering forgotten collections and their impact on society for the preservation of threatened archaeological sites.

Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias·2025

Same author

A New Auto-Regressive Multi-Variable Modified Auto-Encoder for Multivariate Time-Series Prediction: A Case Study with Application to COVID-19 Pandemics.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2024

Same author

COVID-19 Patterns in Araraquara, Brazil: A Multimodal Analysis.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2023

Same author

Robotics Research Growth in Latin America: Topical Collection on LARS 2020.

Journal of intelligent & robotic systems·2023

Same author

Improved Behavioral Box and Sensing Techniques for Analysis of Tactile Discrimination Tasks in Rodents.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Same author

An Augmented Reality Periscope for Submarines with Extended Visual Classification.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021

Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands

Published on: August 29, 2019

A Versatile Method for Depth Data Error Estimation in RGB-D Sensors.

Elizabeth V Cabrera¹, Luis E Ortiz², Bruno M F da Silva³

¹Natalnet Associate Laboratories, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Campus Universitário, Natal RN 59.078-970, Brazil. vcabrera@dca.ufrn.br.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

|September 19, 2018

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new method to estimate depth data errors from 3D sensors using a checkerboard pattern. This technique accurately assesses RGB-D sensor quality for robotics applications like SLAM.

Keywords:

RGB-D sensors RMS error accuracy

More Related Videos

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Electrochemical Rate Constant Estimation

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Electrochemical Rate Constant Estimation

Published on: October 10, 2018

Cereal Crop Ear Counting in Field Conditions Using Zenithal RGB Images

Cereal Crop Ear Counting in Field Conditions Using Zenithal RGB Images

Published on: February 2, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands

Published on: August 29, 2019

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Electrochemical Rate Constant Estimation

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Electrochemical Rate Constant Estimation

Published on: October 10, 2018

Cereal Crop Ear Counting in Field Conditions Using Zenithal RGB Images

Cereal Crop Ear Counting in Field Conditions Using Zenithal RGB Images

Published on: February 2, 2019

Area of Science:

Computer Vision
Robotics
Metrology

Background:

Accurate depth data is crucial for 3D sensing and robotics.
Existing methods for evaluating depth data quality can be complex or time-consuming.
Generic RGB-D sensors (structured light, time-of-flight, stereo) require reliable error estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a versatile and accurate method for estimating the Root Mean Square (RMS) error of depth data from generic 3D sensors.
To develop a generalized equation for RMS error as a function of sensor distance.
To validate the proposed method against state-of-the-art approaches.

Main Methods:

Utilizing a standard checkerboard pattern to generate real and measured corner coordinates.
Creating two point clouds: one with true pattern corner coordinates and one with sensor-provided coordinates.
Registering the point clouds to compute RMS error.
Applying curve fitting to derive a distance-dependent RMS error equation.

Main Results:

The proposed method accurately estimates depth errors for various 3D sensors.
A generalized equation effectively models RMS error as a function of distance.
The method's accuracy and utility are validated against existing techniques.

Conclusions:

The developed method provides a rapid and reliable way to assess RGB-D sensor quality.
This facilitates crucial robotics applications such as Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) and object recognition.
The technique offers a practical tool for sensor calibration and performance evaluation.