Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Use of Rabbit Eyes in Pharmacokinetic Studies of Intraocular Drugs
Published on: July 23, 2016
In vivo evaluation of a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in the rabbit model
Liliana Werner1, Nathan Ellis1, Joshua Bo Heczko1
1From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Werner, Ellis, Heczko, Peterson, Jiang, Mamalis), John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (Ong, Jain, Wolfe), Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Purpose:
To evaluate the uveal and capsular biocompatibility as well as positioning stability of a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) in vivo in the rabbit model and compare it with a commercially available IOL.
Setting:
John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Design:
Experimental study.
Methods:
Fifteen New Zealand rabbits had the new test IOL (Clareon CNA0T0) implanted in one eye and a control IOL (Acrysof SN60WF) implanted in the contralateral eye. The test IOL is manufactured from a new hydrophobic acrylic material incorporating ultraviolet blocker and blue light filter. Its design is based on the control IOL's platform. The rabbits were followed up with weekly slitlamp evaluations, which assessed inflammatory reactions as well as capsular bag opacification. Anterior chamber depth was measured at 1 and 4 weeks post-implantation (high-frequency ultrasound). After 4 weeks, the rabbits were killed humanely and the eyes were enucleated. The anterior segment was evaluated from the posterior or Miyake-Apple view, and was then processed for complete histopathology.
Results:
There were no statistically significant differences between test and control eyes in terms of postoperative inflammation and capsular biocompatibility, including posterior capsule opacification (P = .34, paired t test), and anterior capsule opacification (P = .53, paired t test), as observed during clinical and pathological evaluation. In vivo axial positioning for the test IOL was comparable to the control IOL and stable over time (P = .531 versus P = .788).
Conclusions:
The new IOL showed biocompatibility and stability comparable to the control IOL.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
The Fluid Mosaic Model
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Evaluation
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

