Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Replication in Eukaryotes02:31

Replication in Eukaryotes

205.1K
Overview
205.1K
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs02:39

lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs

10.0K
In humans, more than 80% of the genome gets transcribed. However, only around 2% of the genome codes for proteins. The remaining part produces non-coding RNAs which includes ribosomal RNAs, transfer RNAs, telomerase RNAs, and regulatory RNAs, among other types. A large number of regulatory non-coding RNAs have been classified into two groups depending upon their length – small non-coding RNAs, such as microRNA, which are less than 200 nucleotides in length, and long non-coding RNA...
10.0K
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region02:40

The Eukaryotic Promoter Region

18.8K
The eukaryotic promoter region is a segment of DNA located upstream of a gene. It contains an RNA polymerase binding site, a transcription start site, and several cis-regulatory sequences.  The proximal promoter region is located in the vicinity of the gene and has cis-regulatory sequences and the core promoter. The core promoter is the binding site for RNA polymerase and is usually located between -35 and +35 nucleotides from the transcription start site. The distal promoter regions are...
18.8K
Exon Recombination02:32

Exon Recombination

4.2K
The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes. 
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
4.2K
Eukaryotic RNA Polymerases00:58

Eukaryotic RNA Polymerases

27.1K
RNA Polymerase (RNAP) is conserved in all animals, with bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic RNAPs sharing significant sequence, structural, and functional similarities. Among the three eukaryotic RNAPs, RNA Polymerase II is most similar to bacterial RNAP in terms of both structural organization and folding topologies of the enzyme subunits. However, these similarities are not reflected in their mechanism of action.
All three eukaryotic RNAPs require specific transcription factors, of which the...
27.1K
The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes02:40

The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes

38.6K
The “tree of life” describes the evolution of life and the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The root of the tree is the common ancestor to all life on Earth. All other species radiate from this point, much like the branches of a tree. The numerous tips of these branches on the tree of life represent every living, or extant, species. Extinct species, which are species that no longer exist, can be found towards the center of the tree. Currently, these organisms, both...
38.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome Scanning Reveals the Genetic Basis of a Color Pattern Morphotype in an Island Population of the European Adder (Vipera berus).

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Mucin modulates phage infection dynamics and biofilm formation in enteropathogenic <i>Yersinia enterocolitica</i>.

Current research in microbial sciences·2026
Same author

Gut microbiome profiles in Chilean participants with colorectal adenomas: an exploratory 16S rRNA sequencing study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Sulphur metabolism as a key factor in the evolution of environmental adaptation of <i>Acidihalobacter</i>.

Microbial genomics·2026
Same author

On the Low Abundance of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Bacteriophage Genomes and Their Random Acquisition via Specialized Transduction.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Draft assemblies for 177 bird species enhance genus-level coverage.

GigaScience·2026
Same journal

Development of CypriSSR: a genome-wide, chromosome-level microsatellite database for multiple cyprinidae species.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation·2026
Same journal

KitBase Expanded: An Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Resource for 3,268 Fast-Neutron-Irradiated Rice Mutants.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation·2026
Same journal

PhaLP 2.0: extending the community-oriented phage lysin database with a SUBLYME pipeline for metagenomic discovery.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation·2026
Same journal

A similarity metric, rubric, and unified hierarchy for biomedical publication types and study designs.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation·2026
Same journal

GUTAID: a curated database linking gut microbial antigens to autoimmune mechanisms.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation·2026
Same journal

Rosetta Statements: simplifying FAIR knowledge graph construction with a user-centred approach.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

The ITS2 Database
16:17

The ITS2 Database

Published on: March 12, 2012

32.3K

Improved ontology for eukaryotic single-exon coding sequences in biological databases.

Roddy Jorquera1,2, Carolina González1, Philip Clausen3

  • 1Center for Bioinformatics and Genome Biology, Fundacion Ciencia & Vida, Avenida Zañartu 1482, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile.

Database : the Journal of Biological Databases and Curation
|September 22, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study clarifies the definition of single-exon genes (SEGs) to prevent misinterpretations. A structured vocabulary is proposed to distinguish true SEGs from isoforms, improving gene annotation and disease association studies.

More Related Videos

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

19.9K
Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
09:45

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

The ITS2 Database
16:17

The ITS2 Database

Published on: March 12, 2012

32.3K
Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

19.9K
Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
09:45

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Accurate biological knowledge extraction relies on structured vocabularies.
  • The term 'single-exon gene' (SEG) is ambiguous, leading to misinterpretations.
  • Existing definitions fail to distinguish SEGs with introns in untranslated regions (UTRs) from those without.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a structured vocabulary for disambiguating single-exon genes (SEGs).
  • To differentiate true SEGs from single-exon mRNA isoforms arising from alternative splicing.
  • To facilitate accurate gene annotation and improve understanding of SEG roles in diseases.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and comparative analysis of existing SEG definitions.
  • Development of a structured vocabulary with clear descriptions and definitions.
  • Analysis of RNA-seq data to identify and classify different types of single-exon gene entities.

Main Results:

  • Identified critical ambiguities in the current definition of SEGs.
  • Distinguished between SEGs with and without introns in UTRs.
  • Differentiated true SEGs from single-exon isoforms derived from multi-exon genes.

Conclusions:

  • A precise vocabulary is essential to avoid errors in gene annotation databases.
  • Disambiguating SEG types is crucial for reassessing their evolution, regulation, and disease associations.
  • Improved classification of SEGs can enhance the detection of links to cancers and developmental disorders.