Large outbreak of mumps virus genotype G among vaccinated students in Norway, 2015 to 2016

Lamprini Veneti1,2, Katrine Borgen1, Kaja Sverdrup Borge1

  • 1Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Insights

A 2015-2016 Norway mumps outbreak in vaccinated students revealed genotype G strains. Two measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine doses reduced hospitalization and severe outcomes, but protection against genotype G was suboptimal.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Virology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Mumps outbreaks can occur in highly vaccinated populations.
  • The measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, typically genotype A, is used globally.
  • Understanding vaccine effectiveness against circulating mumps genotypes is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate a large mumps outbreak in Norway among vaccinated students.
  • To determine the genotype of the mumps virus involved in the outbreak.
  • To assess the effectiveness of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine during the outbreak.

Main Methods:

  • Case definition: clinical mumps infection notified between September 2015 and June 2016.
  • Laboratory confirmation and PCR-based genotyping of suspected cases.
  • Statistical analysis to compare outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.

Main Results:

  • 232 cases notified, predominantly in individuals aged 23 years; 61% were male.
  • 66 of 68 genotyped cases were identified as mumps genotype G.
  • Two MMR vaccine doses significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization (aRR: 0.14), orchitis (aRR: 0.21), and severe outcomes (aRR: 0.25).

Conclusions:

  • The mumps genotype G outbreak in vaccinated students suggests suboptimal protection from the current genotype A vaccine.
  • Maintaining high vaccination coverage and vaccinating unvaccinated individuals are recommended.
  • Further research into vaccine efficacy against diverse mumps genotypes is warranted.

Related Concept Videos

Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

Overview
51.7K
Student t Distribution01:31

Student t Distribution

The population standard deviation is rarely known in many day-to-day examples of statistics. When the sample sizes are large, it is easy to estimate the population standard deviation using a confidence interval, which provides results close enough to the original value. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
The Student t distribution was developed by William S. Goset (1876–1937) of the...
14.2K
Microsoft Excel: Student's t-Test01:25

Microsoft Excel: Student's t-Test

Student's t-test in Microsoft Excel is a statistical method used to compare the means of two groups to determine if they are significantly different from each other. It's commonly used to evaluate hypotheses, such as testing whether a treatment has an effect compared to a control group. Excel provides built-in functions to perform t-tests, making it accessible for users needing to conduct basic statistical analysis.
To conduct a t-test in Excel, use the T.TEST function or the "Data...
1.7K
Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
592
What are Viruses?00:50

What are Viruses?

Overview
128.2K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.0K