Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Tear-Derived Exosomal miR-15a as New Diagnostic Tool for Diabetic Retinopathy
Published on: December 30, 2025
PERIPAPILLARY NEUROVASCULAR COUPLING IN THE EARLY STAGES OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY
Tiago M Rodrigues1,2, João P Marques1,3,4, Mário Soares1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), E.P.E. Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal.
Purpose:
To study radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density in the early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR), using optical coherence tomography angiography.
Methods:
A cross-sectional evaluation of RPCs was performed using optical coherence tomography angiography (Avanti RTVue-XR 100, Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA). Annular RPC density was the primary outcome. Global density and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness were secondary outcomes. Diabetic eyes were divided into three groups: no DR, mild nonproliferative DR (mild NPDR), and moderate NPDR. Multilevel mixed-effects univariate and multivariate linear regression models were used.
Results:
We included 155 eyes (n = 42 control; n = 27 no DR; n = 28 mild NPDR; and n = 58 moderate NPDR) from 86 subjects (mean [SD] age 63.39 [10.70] years; 46.45% male). When compared with controls, a significant decrease in annular RPC density was found in all groups of diabetic eyes on multivariate analysis (no DR: β = -2.95, P < 0.001; mild NPDR: β = -1.76, P = 0.017; and moderate NPDR: β = -2.82, P < 0.001). We also detected a significant decrease in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in diabetic eyes (even in the no DR group). Furthermore, in diabetic eyes, annular RPC density and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness correlated significantly (R = 0.4874, P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Peripapillary neurovascular changes occur early in the course of DR. Their significance in the progression of DR warrants further research.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Stages of Infection

