Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

08:42
Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
Published on: May 5, 2015
12.6K
Discovering social groups via latent structure learning
Tatiana Lau1, Hillard T Pouncy1, Samuel J Gershman1
1Department of Psychology.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|September 29, 2018
Summary
People learn social group boundaries by observing relationships between others, not just direct similarities. This latent structure learning influences choices and attributions, even when explicit labels conflict.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Social Psychology
- Computational Modeling
Background:
- Human societies universally feature social coalitions, but the mechanisms for learning and representing group boundaries remain poorly understood.
- Existing models often rely on explicit category labels or pairwise similarity, potentially overlooking more complex relational learning processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how individuals infer social group structures beyond explicit labels and similarity.
- To examine the role of relational information in forming social group representations.
- To test whether inferred latent groups influence behavior even when contradicted by explicit group labels.
Main Methods:
- Developed a computational model of latent structure learning to predict social group inference.
- Conducted four experiments involving consequential social learning (e.g., political values) in controlled environments.
- Manipulated the presence and salience of explicit group labels versus inferred latent structures.
Main Results:
- Evidence suggests people integrate relational information (how others relate to each other) to infer group boundaries.
- Inferred latent social groups significantly influenced individual choices and attributions about other agents.
- The influence of latent groups persisted even when explicit labels contradicted the inferred structure.
Conclusions:
- Social group representations are dynamically formed through learning latent relational structures.
- This mechanism provides a unified account for social learning and group formation, potentially explaining phenomena like balance theory.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
56.1K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K
Social Scripts
10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Social Traps
26.9K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Social Facilitation
36.6K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.6K
Social Loafing
39.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.7K

