Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: September 13, 2022
Resection Rectopexy Is Still an Acceptable Operation for Rectal Prolapse.
Resection rectopexy (RR) and ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) show similar outcomes for rectal prolapse treatment. Both surgical techniques demonstrated comparable complication and recurrence rates in this comparative study.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal surgery
- Surgical outcomes research
- Pelvic floor disorders
Background:
- Rectal prolapse is a condition requiring surgical intervention.
- Resection rectopexy (RR) and ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) are surgical options for rectal prolapse.
- Comparative data on the efficacy and safety of RR versus VMR is essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the complication and prolapse recurrence rates between resection rectopexy (RR) and ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR).
- To evaluate the long-term outcomes of RR and VMR in patients with rectal prolapse.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study comparing patients who underwent RR or VMR between 2009 and 2016.
- Propensity score matching was utilized to control for baseline differences between the groups.
- Primary endpoints included complications and prolapse recurrence rates, with median follow-up and time to recurrence analyzed.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in complications or recurrence rates were observed between the RR and VMR groups (10.2% vs 10.1%, P = 0.43).
- VMR patients had higher BMI and poorer physical status, but also utilized robotic approaches more frequently and had shorter hospital stays.
- Median follow-up and time to recurrence were similar between the two surgical techniques.
Conclusions:
- Neither resection rectopexy nor ventral mesh rectopexy demonstrated superiority in terms of complications or recurrence rates for rectal prolapse treatment.
- The choice of surgical technique may depend on patient-specific factors and surgeon preference, as outcomes were comparable.
- Further research may be needed to explore nuances in patient selection and long-term functional outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:41Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
03:49Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Assessing Body Temperature - Rectal
Follow these steps for rectal temperature assessment:
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves to prevent cross-infection.
Step 2: Position the patient in a side-lying position to better visualize the rectal...
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Operational Amplifiers
Real Number Operations