Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula01:10

Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula

9.4K
The tibia is the main weight-bearing bone of the lower leg. It is larger than the fibula with which it is paired. The tibia is also the second longest bone in the body and is located right below the skin. The proximal end of the tibia forms the medial and the lateral condyle, which articulates with the condyles of the femur to form the knee joint. Between the articulating surfaces is the irregular elevated area known as the intercondylar eminence that serves as the inferior attachment point for...
9.4K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Fractures: Bone Repair01:27

Fractures: Bone Repair

5.4K
Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
5.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Premature ventricular complexes.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same author

Posterior Electrical Axis Deviation Is Associated With Future Development of Left Bundle Branch Block: A UK Biobank Study.

JACC. Advances·2026
Same author

Assessment of the Relevant Field of View of Unipolar Electrodes Using In Vivo Imaging.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Health Diplomacy and Ethical Considerations for Deployed Military Clinicians Managing Tensions Between Local National Groups.

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same author

Clinical validation of an in silico pace mapping approach to localize both focal and re-entrant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with structural heart disease.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Cultural variation in postoperative care after ankle fracture fixation: a binational matched cohort study.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

14.1K

Tibia fractures and NSAIDs. Does it make a difference? A multicenter retrospective study.

Lauren Fader1, John Whitaker1, Miguel Lopez1

  • 1University of Louisville, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.

Injury
|October 2, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found no significant difference in tibia fracture healing time between patients treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and those receiving opioids for pain. Both pain management strategies proved effective for fracture healing.

Keywords:
Bone healingNSAIDsOpioidsTibia fractures

More Related Videos

A Method for Studying the Temperature Dependence of Dynamic Fracture and Fragmentation
09:12

A Method for Studying the Temperature Dependence of Dynamic Fracture and Fragmentation

Published on: June 28, 2015

8.9K
The Generation of Closed Femoral Fractures in Mice: A Model to Study Bone Healing
05:53

The Generation of Closed Femoral Fractures in Mice: A Model to Study Bone Healing

Published on: August 16, 2018

16.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

14.1K
A Method for Studying the Temperature Dependence of Dynamic Fracture and Fragmentation
09:12

A Method for Studying the Temperature Dependence of Dynamic Fracture and Fragmentation

Published on: June 28, 2015

8.9K
The Generation of Closed Femoral Fractures in Mice: A Model to Study Bone Healing
05:53

The Generation of Closed Femoral Fractures in Mice: A Model to Study Bone Healing

Published on: August 16, 2018

16.2K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Trauma Care
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Post-operative pain management following diaphyseal tibia fractures is crucial for patient recovery.
  • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioid medications are common analgesics, but their comparative effects on fracture healing remain debated.
  • Cultural differences in pain management approaches can influence medication choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the healing time of diaphyseal tibia fractures (OTA/AO 42 A, B, C) treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN).
  • To evaluate the impact of post-operative pain control using NSAIDs versus opioid medications on fracture healing duration.
  • To investigate whether differing geographic and cultural pain management practices affect tibia fracture union rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective screening of tibia fractures (OTA/AO 42 A, B, C) treated with IMN at two level I trauma centers in different countries (2010-2017).
  • Inclusion criteria: radiographic follow-up to union. Cohorts were divided based on post-discharge analgesic prescription: NSAIDs (n=190) or opioids (n=182).
  • Fracture union defined as cortical bridging on AP and lateral radiographs; primary outcome was healing time.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in fracture healing time between the NSAID (180.5 days) and opioid (185 days) groups (p=0.64).
  • Opioid cohort had higher rates of tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, and polytrauma; NSAID cohort had more open fractures.
  • Mean age was similar between groups.

Conclusions:

  • NSAID use in the acute phase of tibia fracture healing did not significantly increase the risk of delayed union or nonunion.
  • The study suggests NSAIDs can be used safely and effectively for pain management in tibia fracture patients.
  • Further prospective randomized studies are recommended to definitively rule out any negative effects of NSAIDs on bone healing.