Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculating the Equilibrium Constant02:46

Calculating the Equilibrium Constant

38.1K
The equilibrium constant for a reaction is calculated from the equilibrium concentrations (or pressures) of its reactants and products. If these concentrations are known, the calculation simply involves their substitution into the Kc expression.
For example, gaseous nitrogen dioxide forms dinitrogen tetroxide according to this equation:
38.1K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

990
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
990
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

25.4K
The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
25.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Candidacy Decision Making for Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR): Lessons from a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2025
Same author

Advances in cardiac resuscitation in the emergency department.

Emergency medicine practice·2022
Same author

Calculated decisions: Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).

Emergency medicine practice·2021
Same author

Calculated decisions: Shock index

Emergency medicine practice·2019
Same author

Calculated decisions: qSOFA (quick SOFA) score for sepsis

Emergency medicine practice·2018
Same author

Complications from Administration of Vasopressors Through Peripheral Venous Catheters: An Observational Study.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2017
Same journal

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: diagnosis and management in the emergency department.

Emergency medicine practice·2026
Same journal

Diagnosis and management of heat stroke and other heat-related illness in the emergency department.

Emergency medicine practice·2026
Same journal

Emergency department evaluation and management of serious and high-risk infections in the febrile returning traveler.

Emergency medicine practice·2026
Same journal

Wide complex tachycardia in the emergency department: an updated approach to diagnosis and management.

Emergency medicine practice·2026
Same journal

Emergency management of renal and genitourinary trauma: best practices update.

Emergency medicine practice·2026
Same journal

Emergency department evaluation and management of severe traumatic brain injury.

Emergency medicine practice·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Assessment of Labile Organic Carbon in Soil Using Sequential Fumigation Incubation Procedures
09:04

Assessment of Labile Organic Carbon in Soil Using Sequential Fumigation Incubation Procedures

Published on: October 29, 2016

12.1K

Calculated decisions: sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score

Kamal Medlej1

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Emergency Medicine Practice
|October 4, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score helps predict patient mortality risk in intensive care units. It uses routine lab results and clinical data for accurate risk assessment.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
04:05

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

Published on: June 30, 2023

2.9K
Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation
05:42

Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Assessment of Labile Organic Carbon in Soil Using Sequential Fumigation Incubation Procedures
09:04

Assessment of Labile Organic Carbon in Soil Using Sequential Fumigation Incubation Procedures

Published on: October 29, 2016

12.1K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
04:05

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

Published on: June 30, 2023

2.9K
Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation
05:42

Z-Scores for Assessing Ovarian Reserve in Young Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Assessing patient mortality risk in intensive care units (ICUs) is crucial for resource allocation and treatment planning.
  • Existing scoring systems require validation with diverse patient populations and updated clinical data.
  • The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a widely recognized tool for evaluating organ dysfunction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the SOFA score for mortality in ICU patients.
  • To determine the association between SOFA score components and patient outcomes.
  • To assess the utility of the SOFA score in diverse intensive care settings.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of anonymized patient data from intensive care units.
  • Inclusion of demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters for SOFA score calculation.
  • Statistical analysis to correlate SOFA scores with in-hospital mortality rates.

Main Results:

  • The SOFA score demonstrated a significant correlation with patient mortality risk.
  • Specific SOFA components, such as respiratory and renal function, were strong predictors of adverse outcomes.
  • Higher SOFA scores at admission and during the ICU stay were associated with increased mortality.

Conclusions:

  • The SOFA score is a valuable and validated tool for predicting mortality in critically ill patients.
  • Clinical data and routine laboratory results, as incorporated by the SOFA score, provide essential prognostic information.
  • The SOFA score aids clinicians in risk stratification and clinical decision-making within the ICU environment.