Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Site-Directed Immobilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 to Solid Surfaces by Click Chemistry
Published on: March 29, 2018
Treatment With a Soluble Bone Morphogenetic Protein Type 1A Receptor (BMPR1A) Fusion Protein Increases Bone Mass and
Frank C Ko1,2, Miranda Van Vliet1, Rachel Ellman1,3
1Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA USA.
Abstract:
Previous work has shown that the soluble murine BMPR1A-fusion protein (mBMPR1A-mFc) binds to BMP2 and BMP4 with high affinity, preventing downstream signaling. Further, treatment of intact and ovariectomized mice with mBMPR1A-mFc leads to increased bone mass, and improved bone microarchitecture and strength, via increased bone formation and reduced resorption. In this study, we tested the effects of mBMPR1A-mFc on disuse-induced bone loss caused by 21 days of hindlimb unloading (HLU) via tail suspension versus cage controls (CONs). Adult female C57BL/6J mice (12 weeks old) were assigned to one of four groups (n = 10 each): CON-VEH; CON-mBMPR1A-mFc; HLU-VEH; and HLU-mBMPR1A-mFc. Mice were injected subcutaneously with VEH or mBMPR1A-mFc (4.5 mg/kg, 2×/week). Leg BMD declined in the HLU-VEH group (-5.3% ± 1.3%), whereas it was unchanged in HLU-mBMPR1A-mFc (-0.3% ± 0.9%, p < 0.05 versus HLU-VEH). Leg BMD increased significantly more in CON-mBMPR1A-mFc than CON-VEH (10.2% ± 0.6% versus 4.4% ± 0.8%). In the femur, trabecular, and cortical bone microarchitecture was worse in the HLU-VEH compared to CON-VEH mice, whereas mBMPR1A-mFc treatment for 3 weeks led to greater Tb.BV/TV, Tb.Th, and midshaft Ct.Th in both the HLU and CON groups compared to comparable VEH-treated counterparts (p < 0.05). HLU-mBMPR1A-mFc mice also had 21% greater failure load (p < 0.05) compared to their VEH-treated counterparts. Dynamic histomorphometry indicated that treatment with mBMPR1A-mFc led to significantly greater mineralizing surface and mineral apposition rate, resulting in a 3.5-fold and fivefold higher bone formation rate in the mBMPR1A-mFc-treated CON and HLU animals versus VEH groups, respectively. mBMPR1A-mFc-treated mice had a similar osteoblast surface but significantly lower osteoclast surface than VEH-treated animals in both the CON and HLU groups. Altogether, these findings suggest that treatment with the soluble BMPR1A fusion protein may be useful for maintenance of skeletal integrity in the setting of disuse-induced bone loss.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into ...
Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification
Bone Structure
Bone Remodeling
Compact Bone
Compact bone, also called cortical bone, is the denser, stronger of the two types of bone tissue. It is found under the periosteum and in the diaphyses of long bones, where it provides support and protection. The microscopic structural unit of compact bone is called an osteon, or haversian system. Each osteon is composed of concentric rings of calcified...
Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...

