Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning
Published on: November 19, 2018
Textural differences between renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography
Burak Kocak1, Aytul Hande Yardimci1, Ceyda Turan Bektas1
1Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Department of Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Machine learning-based quantitative CT texture analysis can differentiate clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cc-RCC) from non-clear cell RCC (non-cc-RCC). However, distinguishing three major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using this method showed poor performance.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Oncology
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) comprises several subtypes with varying prognoses.
- Accurate subtype differentiation is crucial for effective treatment planning.
- Quantitative computed tomography texture analysis (qCT-TA) offers potential for non-invasive tumor characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate machine learning models for distinguishing RCC subtypes using qCT-TA.
- To assess the generalizability and reproducibility of qCT-TA models.
- To compare the performance of qCT-TA on unenhanced versus contrast-enhanced CT images.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 68 RCCs for model development and internal validation, with external validation using 26 RCCs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
- Extraction of 275 texture features from unenhanced and corticomedullary phase CT images.
- Feature selection using radiologist reproducibility and a wrapper-based algorithm, followed by nested cross-validation.
- Classification using artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM), with and without ensemble methods.
Main Results:
- Corticomedullary phase CT images yielded more reproducible texture features (232/275) than unenhanced images (93/275).
- ANN with adaptive boosting achieved the best performance for non-cc-RCC vs. cc-RCC discrimination (MCC=0.728, external accuracy=84.6%).
- Performance was poor for distinguishing three major subtypes; SVM with bagging showed the best results for papillary RCC vs. others (MCC=0.804, external accuracy=69.2%).
Conclusions:
- Machine learning-based qCT-TA can effectively distinguish non-cc-RCC from cc-RCC.
- The current qCT-TA approach demonstrates poor performance in differentiating the three major RCC subtypes.
- Corticomedullary phase CT imaging provides superior texture parameters for RCC analysis compared to unenhanced imaging.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
10:40Label-free, High-Resolution 3D Imaging and Machine Learning Analysis of Intestinal Organoids via Low-Coherence Holotomography
Published on: August 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
Reliability and Validity
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test: