Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Generation of Prostate Cancer Patient Derived Xenograft Models from Circulating Tumor Cells
Published on: October 20, 2015
Effect of Preanalytic Variables on an Automated PTEN Immunohistochemistry Assay for Prostate Cancer
Liana B Guedes1, Carlos L Morais1, Helen Fedor1
1From the Departments of Pathology (Drs Guedes, Morais, Fedor, Hicks, Gurel, De Marzo, and Lotan), Oncology (Drs Trock, De Marzo, and Lotan), and Urology (Drs Trock and De Marzo), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; the Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York (Drs Melamed and Lee); the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Drs Gopalan and Fine); the Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Dr Knudsen); the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr True); and Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York (Dr Scher).
Context.—:
Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a promising prognostic and potentially predictive biomarker in prostate cancer.
Objective.—:
To assess the effects of preanalytic variables on an analytically validated and fully automated PTEN immunohistochemistry assay.
Design.—:
PTEN immunohistochemistry was performed on Ventana immunostaining systems. In benign prostate tissues, immunostaining intensity across variable conditions was assessed by digital image analysis. In prostate tumor tissues, immunostaining was scored visually.
Results.—:
Delay of fixation for 4 hours or longer at room temperature or 48 hours or longer at 4°C and duration of formalin fixation did not significantly alter immunostaining intensity. Intensity of staining was highest in 10% formalin compared with other fixatives. Tumor tissues with PTEN loss processed using protocols from 11 academic institutions were all evaluable and scored identically. PTEN immunostaining of needle biopsies where tissue blocks had been stored for less than 10 years was more frequently scored as nonevaluable compared with blocks that had been stored for 10 years or longer. This effect was less evident for radical prostatectomy specimens, where low rates of nonevaluable staining were seen for 23 years or more of storage. Storage of unstained slides for 5 years at room temperature prior to immunostaining resulted in equivalent scoring compared with freshly cut slides. Machine-to-machine variability assessed across 3 Ventana platforms and 2 institutions was negligible in 12 tumors, and platform-to-platform variability was also minor comparing Ventana and Leica instruments across 77 tumors (κ = 0.926).
Conclusions.—:
Automated PTEN immunostaining is robust to most preanalytic variables in the prostate and may be performed on prostate tumor tissues subjected to a wide range of preanalytic conditions. These data may help guide assay development if PTEN becomes a key predictive biomarker.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
These...
Graphs of Equations in Two Variables
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
Work and Energy for Variable Forces

