Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Soil Ecosystem02:23

The Soil Ecosystem

24.8K
Plants obtain inorganic minerals and water from the soil, which acts as a natural medium for land plants. The composition and quality of soil depend not only on the chemical constituents but also on the presence of living organisms. In general, soils contain three major components:
24.8K
What is an Ecosystem?01:17

What is an Ecosystem?

47.0K
Overview
47.0K
Role of Affect in Interpersonal Attraction01:24

Role of Affect in Interpersonal Attraction

225
Affect plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal evaluations and perceptions. Emotions influence how individuals judge and respond to others, often determining whether interactions are viewed positively or negatively. This effect can manifest directly through interactions with the person in question or indirectly via associations with unrelated emotional experiences.Direct Effects of Affect on AttractionAffect directly influences interpersonal attraction when a person’s behavior...
225
The Influence of Affect on Cognition01:29

The Influence of Affect on Cognition

285
Positive affect significantly influences cognitive processes, including evaluation, memory, creativity, and social judgments. Compared to negative affect, positive emotional states promote more favorable interpretations of stimuli, cognitive flexibility, and heuristic processing. These effects highlight emotions' powerful role in shaping how individuals perceive, remember, and interact with the world.Influence on Evaluation and AttributionWhen individuals experience positive affect, they are...
285
The Influence of Cognition on Affect01:29

The Influence of Cognition on Affect

215
Cognition plays a pivotal role in shaping emotional experiences, as demonstrated by Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion. According to this model, emotion arises from a combination of physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation. The body’s physiological response to stimuli is ambiguous and only gains emotional significance through cognitive labeling. For instance, an increased heart rate and adrenaline surge while standing near an attractive person may be...
215
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

7.7K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perspective article: Multisectoral considerations to enable a circular economy for plastics.

Journal of hazardous materials·2025
Same author

Modeling the impact of surface water abstractions and climate on the ecological quality and recreational potential of a stratified lake.

Journal of environmental management·2025
Same author

Plastic-Associated Chemicals: Late Lessons from Early Equilibrium Partitioning Science.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Comparative microplastic analysis in urban waters using μ-FTIR and Py-GC-MS: A case study in Amsterdam" [Environmental Pollution 351 (2024) 124088].

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2024
Same author

Comparative microplastic analysis in urban waters using μ-FTIR and Py-GC-MS: A case study in Amsterdam.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2024
Same author

Effects of polymethylmethacrylate nanoplastics on the polychaete Hediste diversicolor: Behavioural, regenerative, and biochemical responses.

Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2023
Same journal

Ocean warming shapes the marine plastisphere: Microbial assembly, vector effects, and biogeochemical feedbacks of microplastics.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same journal

Plasma-generated reactive species in water: A sustainable strategy against Aeromonas hydrophila.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same journal

Sediment capping causes metabolic stress and hydrogen sulfide intrusion in Posidonia australis: Implications for seagrass restoration.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same journal

Temporal variations in net plastic transport from the Rhine and Saigon rivers into the sea.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same journal

Environmental aging behavior and organic matter release of biodegradable microplastics PLA, PBAT and PHBV under different coastal environmental conditions.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same journal

Macroalgae detritus accelerates degradation of recalcitrant organic matter in coastal marine sediments.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater
08:27

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater

Published on: November 7, 2025

1.2K

Do microplastics affect marine ecosystem productivity?

Tineke A Troost1, Térence Desclaux2, Heather A Leslie3

  • 1Deltares, Department of Marine and Coastal Systems, P.O. Box 177, 2600, MH Delft, The Netherlands.

Marine Pollution Bulletin
|October 11, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Microplastics in the North Sea did not impact overall primary or secondary production. However, the study found localized shifts in secondary production patterns, highlighting data gaps for accurate ecosystem-level impact assessments.

Keywords:
Delft3D-GEMEcosystem productivityMicroplasticsModelling approachNorth SeaZooplankton

More Related Videos

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

50.9K
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
14:10

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater
08:27

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater

Published on: November 7, 2025

1.2K
Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

50.9K
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
14:10

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Marine ecology
  • Biogeochemistry
  • Environmental modeling

Background:

  • Marine ecosystems are crucial for global productivity.
  • Laboratory studies indicate microplastics harm individual algae and zooplankton.
  • Ecosystem-level impacts of microplastics on productivity remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate the ecosystem-level impacts of microplastics on marine productivity.
  • To assess potential effects on primary and secondary production in the North Sea.
  • To identify knowledge gaps in microplastic research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a biogeochemical model (Delft3D-GEM) for the North Sea.
  • Integrated laboratory findings on microplastic effects into the model.
  • Simulated microplastic concentrations and their impacts under field conditions.

Main Results:

  • The model predicted no significant change in total North Sea primary or secondary production.
  • Spatial patterns of secondary production showed localized alterations of approximately ±10%.
  • Model outcomes were sensitive to assumptions regarding microplastic data.

Conclusions:

  • Microplastics may not affect overall marine ecosystem productivity but can alter spatial distribution.
  • Scarcity of field data on microplastics is a major limitation.
  • Further research is needed to refine estimates of microplastic impacts on marine ecosystems.