Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
Published on: March 1, 2019
Developmental outcomes of an individualised complementary feeding intervention for stunted children: a substudy from
Boris Martinez1,2, Sayra Cardona3, Patricia Rodas3
1Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala.
Insights
An intensive feeding intervention did not significantly improve child development in Guatemalan children compared to usual care. Both approaches showed positive developmental impacts, highlighting the importance of consistent support for early childhood development.
Area of Science:
- Global child health
- Pediatric nutrition
- Developmental pediatrics
Background:
- Stunting affects early child development globally, with Guatemala facing high rates.
- Community health worker (CHW) interventions are crucial for addressing developmental delays in vulnerable populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate an intensive CHW-led complementary feeding intervention's impact on early child development in stunted Guatemalan children.
- To compare developmental outcomes between the intervention and usual care groups.
Main Methods:
- A substudy of a randomized controlled trial involving 210 stunted children (6-24 months) in rural indigenous Maya communities.
- Participants received either an intensive complementary feeding intervention or usual care over 6 months, with monthly CHW home visits.
- Primary outcomes measured changes in Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) subscale z-scores.
Main Results:
- 100 children (47 intervention, 53 usual care) were analyzed.
- No statistically significant differences in age-adjusted BSID subscale scores were found between the intervention and usual care groups.
- Both groups showed significant within-subject improvements in developmental scores over time.
Conclusions:
- The intensive complementary feeding intervention did not yield significantly greater developmental improvements than usual care in this population.
- Both the intervention and usual care demonstrated positive impacts on child development, underscoring the value of sustained support.
Objective:
Stunting is a common cause of early child developmental delay; Guatemala has the fourth highest rate of stunting globally. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of an intensive community health worker-led complementary feeding intervention on early child development in Guatemala. We hypothesised that the intervention would improve child development over usual care.
Design:
A substudy from a larger individually randomised (1:1 allocation ratio), parallel-group superiority trial, with blinding of study staff collecting outcomes data.
Setting:
Rural, indigenous Maya communities in Guatemala.
Participants:
210 stunted children (height-for-age z-score ≤-2.5) aged 6-24 months, previously randomised to usual care (106) or an intensive complementary feeding intervention (104). 84 in the intervention and 91 in the usual care arm agreed to participate.
Interventions:
Community health workers conducted monthly home visits for 6 months, providing usual care or individualised complementary feeding education.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcomes were change in z-scores for the subscales of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), Third Edition.
Results:
100 individuals were included in the final analysis, 47 in the intervention and 53 in the usual care arm. No statistically significant differences in age-adjusted scores between the arms were observed for any subscale. However, improvements within-subjects in both arms were observed (median duration between measurements 189 days (IQR 182-189)). Mean change for subscales was 0.45 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.67) z-scores in the intervention, and 0.43 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.61) in the usual care arm.
Conclusions:
An intensive complementary feeding intervention did not significantly improve developmental outcomes more than usual care in stunted, indigenous Guatemalan children. However, both interventions had significant positive impacts on developmental outcomes.
Trial Registration Number:
NCT02509936.
Stage:
Results.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
09:05Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Published on: June 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Complementary DNA
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm