Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
Home Orthostatic Training in Elderly Patients with Vasovagal Syncope - A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial
Steven Podd1, Jacqueline Hunt1, Neil Sulke1
1Eastbourne District General Hospital, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of home orthostatic training (HOT) on autonomic reflexes in elderly patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). Methods: Design and Setting: A single-blind randomised control trial was conducted at Eastbourne District General Hospital, East Sussex NHS Trust. Patients: Individuals with recurrent syncope underwent tilt-table testing between August 2007 and October 2009.Those with at least two syncopal episodes and tilt-test proven VVS were recruited. Participants were divided into those aged >65 years (O65) and those aged <65 years (U65). Interventions: Patients in the O65 group were randomised 1:1 to receive active HOT (O65+) or sham HOT (O65-). The U65 group received active HOT. Participants performed HOT/sham HOT and recorded their training and symptoms. Patients had a repeat tilt test at 3 months. Outcome Measures: Time to syncope at repeat tilt-table testing, low-frequency heart rate variability (LF-HRV), high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV), mean upslope baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and mean downslope BRS were assessed. Results: A total of 106 patients with recurrent syncope underwent tilt-table testing. Of these, 45 consecutive patients (30 in the O65 group and 15 in the U65 group) were recruited. Two, one and three patients withdrew or were lost-to-follow-up in the O65+, O65-, and U65 groups, respectively. Symptomatic benefit occurred in four (31 %) of the O65+, four (29 %) of the O65-, and six (50 %) of the U65. None of the autonomic measures changed significantly in any group. No difference was seen with HF-HRV, LF-HRV mean upslope BRS and mean downslope BRS. Fifty per-cent of the O65+ group stopped training because of back pain. Time constraint (25 %) was the most common reason for cessation in the U65 group. Conclusions: Despite good tilt training compliance, no improvement in autonomic measures in any group was shown. The most common reason for cessation of training was back pain in the elderly groups. This study does not support the use of HOT in elderly patients.
More Related Videos
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
07:01Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Control System Problem
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...
Combinatorial Gene Control
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...