Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026
Generation of Prostate Cancer Patient Derived Xenograft Models from Circulating Tumor Cells
Published on: October 20, 2015
A Patient Decision Aid for Men With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Case Study of Natural Implementation
Dawn Stacey1, Monica Taljaard, Rodney H Breau
1Author Affiliations: School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Dr Stacey); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada (Drs Stacey, Taljaard, and Breau and Ms Carley); Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Dr Breau); St. Paul's Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (Ms Baba); Quality and Continuous Improvement, Acute and Emergency Services Branch, Saskatchewan Ministry of Health, Regina, Canada (Ms Blackmore); Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Ms Boland); Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Wu); Ages Cancer Assessment Clinic, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada (Ms Smylie); and Research Center CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Hospital Saint-François D'Assise, Canada (Dr Légaré).
Background:
There are multiple options for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) help empower individuals and reduce unwarranted practice variation, but few are used in clinical practice.
Objective:
We compared 2 programs implementing PtDAs for men with localized prostate cancer.
Methods:
This was a comparative case study. Case 1 was a hospital prostate pathway and case 2 was a provincial prostate pathway with 2 locations (2a, 2b). Nurses provided the men with PtDAs and answered questions. Data sources were as follows: (a) 2 years administrative data for men with localized prostate cancer, (b) clinicians survey and interviews, and (c) patients/spouses interviews. Analysis was within and across cases.
Results:
The PtDA was used with 23% of men in case 1 (95% confidence interval, 19.8%-26.1%) and 98% of men in case 2a (95% confidence interval, 96.5%-99.8%). The pathway was not implemented in case 2b. Men given the PtDA had positive experiences. Many clinicians supported the use of PtDAs, some adapted their discussions with patients, and others did not support the use of PtDAs. To increase use in case 1, participants identified needing a Canadian PtDA available electronically and endorsed by all clinicians. In case 2b, the provincial prostate pathway needed to be implemented.
Conclusions:
There was variable uptake of the PtDAs between the cases. Men who received the PtDA had positive outcomes. Several strategies were identified to increase or sustain PtDA use.
Implications For Practice:
Nurses have a key role in supporting men making decisions about prostate cancer treatment by providing PtDAs, answering questions, and advocating for men's preferences.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
01:10Nature and Nurture
01:15Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
01:20Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
01:32What is Natural Selection?
02:24Comparative Excretory Systems