Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language01:16

Language

913
Language is a unique communication system that uses words and systematic rules to organize and transmit information. Unlike other forms of communication, which may involve postures, movements, odors, or vocalizations, language relies on symbols and grammar. This makes human communication distinct from that of other species, who also communicate but do not use language in the same way humans do.
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
913
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

821
Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs.
821
Language Development01:22

Language Development

912
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
912
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

800
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
800
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

576
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
576
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

351
R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
351

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconsidering Listener Evaluations of Creaky Voice.

Language and speech·2026
Same author

The impact of talker variability and individual differences on word learning in adults.

Brain research·2025
Same author

A Picture May Be Worth 1,000 Words, but Is It Worth a Letter? Examining Whether the Choice of Label Affects the Perception of Speech Sounds.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024
Same author

Examining the Relationship Between Multiple Tests of Receptive Vocabulary.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024
Same author

Spectral analysis of strident fricatives in cisgender and transfeminine speakersa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Intelligibility as a measure of speech perception: Current approaches, challenges, and recommendations.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.7K

Methodological considerations for interpreting the Language Familiarity Effect in talker processing.

Susannah V Levi1

  • 1Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, New York.

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science
|October 18, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Listeners better process voice information in their native language due to the Language Familiarity Effect (LFE). This review examines how task and stimulus factors influence LFE findings, highlighting methodological impacts.

Keywords:
Speech perceptiontalker perceptiontalker recognition

More Related Videos

Methodology for Sputum Induction and Laboratory Processing
13:28

Methodology for Sputum Induction and Laboratory Processing

Published on: December 17, 2017

28.7K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.7K
Methodology for Sputum Induction and Laboratory Processing
13:28

Methodology for Sputum Induction and Laboratory Processing

Published on: December 17, 2017

28.7K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Speech Processing

Background:

  • The Language Familiarity Effect (LFE) describes enhanced processing of talker-voice information in a native language compared to an unfamiliar one.
  • Recent research has explored phonological processing and individual listener differences as key factors in the LFE.
  • Methodological influences on the LFE remain under-examined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the existing literature on the Language Familiarity Effect.
  • To investigate how methodological variables, specifically task effects and stimulus length, impact talker-voice processing performance.
  • To synthesize current understanding and identify areas for future research in LFE.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies investigating the Language Familiarity Effect.
  • Analysis of how experimental designs, including task type and stimulus duration, affect LFE outcomes.
  • Synthesis of findings related to phonological processing and individual differences.

Main Results:

  • Phonological information and processing are frequently implicated as mechanisms supporting the LFE.
  • Methodological choices, such as task demands and stimulus length, can significantly alter the observed LFE.
  • Variability in results may stem from unexamined methodological factors.

Conclusions:

  • The Language Familiarity Effect is robust but sensitive to experimental methodology.
  • Further research should carefully control for task and stimulus variables to better understand the LFE.
  • Understanding methodological impacts is crucial for accurate interpretation of LFE research.