Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Prognostic value of estimated plasma volume in acute heart failure in three cohort studies
Masatake Kobayashi1,2, Patrick Rossignol1,3, João Pedro Ferreira1,4
1INSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques 1433, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Pierre Drouin, CHRU de Nancy, Inserm 1116 and INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists) F-CRIN Network, Institut lorrain du coeur et des, vaisseaux Louis Mathieu, Université de Lorraine, 4, rue du Morvan, 54500, Nancy, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.
Aims:
Estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) predicts prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). It remains unclear whether admission, discharge or change ePVS best predicts post-discharge outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed three cohort studies: 383 patients admitted at the Tokyo Medical University hospital, 165 patients admitted at the Centro Hospitalar do Porto and 164 patients admitted at the Nancy University Hospital (ICALOR study). ePVS at admission and at discharge as well as its change thereof were, respectively, calculated using the Duarte and Strauss formulas, both derived from hemoglobin and hematocrit ratios. Clinical variables including physical assessment, biological and echocardiographic parameters were recorded. The clinical outcome was a composite of re-hospitalization for worsening HF or all-cause mortality [corrected].
Results:
The primary outcomes occurred in 27.2% at 1 year (in the Tokyo cohort), 45.3% at 6 months (in the Porto cohort) and 53.9% at median terms of 298.3 days (in the ICALOR study). After adjusting for potential confounders including natriuretic peptide, discharge ePVS remained significantly associated with increased rates of composite outcome in the Tokyo and Porto cohorts and ICALOR study [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21 (1.01-1.44), p = 0.04; HR 1.45 (1.16-1.81), p < 0.01; HR 1.45 (1.16-1.81), p < 0.01, respectively]. In addition, a pooled analysis yielded a significant improvement in reclassification with discharge ePVS [net reclassification index 13.6% (5.9-22.7), p = 0.004].
Conclusions:
As validated in three independent ADHF cohorts, ePVS at discharge was independently associated with post-discharge clinical outcomes and improved the risk stratification of patients admitted for ADHF on top of well-established prognostic markers.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
07:41Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Published on: March 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction