Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

09:21
Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
Published on: June 17, 2010
50.6K
Measuring Scientific Impact With the h-Index: A Primer for Pathologists
William E Schreiber1, Dean M Giustini2
1Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|October 23, 2018
Summary
The h-index is a metric for scientific output, considering publication count and citations. While useful for evaluating researchers, it has limitations and alternative indices exist.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics and Scientometrics
- Research Evaluation
Background:
- The h-index is a widely used metric to quantify the productivity and citation impact of researchers.
- It serves as a tool for assessing individual and group scientific performance in academic and research settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive description of the h-index as a measure of scientific output.
- To elucidate the methodology behind the h-index calculation and its applications in research evaluation.
Main Methods:
- The h-index is calculated based on the number of publications and the number of citations each publication has received.
- It can be applied to individuals, university departments, and research institutes for performance evaluation.
Main Results:
- The h-index offers an objective and quantitative measure of scientific contribution.
- However, it has limitations, including not accounting for authorship position, co-authorship, or self-citations.
- Several alternative bibliometric indices have been developed to address these deficiencies.
Conclusions:
- The h-index is a valuable tool for assessing scientific output but should be used with an understanding of its limitations.
- Pathologists and clinical laboratory scientists should be aware of the h-index, as it may influence professional advancement decisions.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
66.3K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
66.3K
The Scientific Method
266.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
266.3K
The Scientific Method
65.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
65.2K
Scientific Laws and Theories
88.3K
Scientific Laws
88.3K
Impact of Groups on Groups
249
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
249
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
582
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
582

