Detecting long-lived autodependency changes in a multivariate system via change point detection and regime switching
Jedelyn Cabrieto1, Janne Adolf2, Francis Tuerlinckx2
1Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Jed.Cabrieto@kuleuven.be.
Scientific Reports
|October 25, 2018
Summary
We developed two methods to detect critical changes in dynamic systems, like epileptic seizures or psychiatric conditions. KCP-AR and regime switching AR(1) models help predict these events by analyzing system variable changes.
Area of Science:
- Dynamical Systems Analysis
- Statistical Modeling
- Computational Psychiatry
Background:
- Long-lived changes in dynamic system variable autodependency characterize critical events.
- Predicting phenomena like epileptic seizures, volcanic eruptions, and psychiatric conditions requires methods to detect these changes in multivariate time series.
- Current methods may not effectively pinpoint specific parameter changes or handle long-lived shifts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and compare two novel methods for detecting changes in the autodependency of dynamic system variables.
- To evaluate the performance of these methods in identifying critical events.
- To apply these methods to psychopathology data to investigate emotional inertia before depressive relapse.
Main Methods:
- Kernel Change Point-Autoregression (KCP-AR): An adaptation of Kernel Change Point (KCP) applied to running autocorrelations to focus on parameter changes.
- Regime Switching Autoregressive (AR(1)) Models: Models fitted where only autodependency parameters differ across regimes.
- Simulation Study: Comparison of KCP-AR and regime switching AR(1) under varying conditions of variable correlation.
Main Results:
- KCP-AR outperforms regime switching AR(1) when system variables are uncorrelated.
- Regime switching AR(1) is more reliable when multicollinearity is severe.
- Regime switching AR(1) may produce recurrent switches even for long-lived changes, potentially limiting its applicability.
Conclusions:
- Both KCP-AR and regime switching AR(1) offer valuable approaches for detecting critical changes in dynamic systems.
- The choice of method depends on the specific characteristics of the data, particularly the degree of variable correlation.
- These methods hold promise for understanding and predicting critical events, including psychiatric relapses, by analyzing changes in emotional inertia.
Related Concept Videos
Switching of BJT
861
Switching behavior in Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs) is a fundamental aspect utilized in various electronic circuits, particularly for digital logic applications like switches and amplifiers. In a typical switching circuit, a BJT alternates between cut-off and saturation modes, corresponding to the "off" and "on" states, respectively, thus behaving like an ideal switch.
Cut-off Mode ("Off" State): In this state, both the emitter-base and collector-base junctions are...
Cut-off Mode ("Off" State): In this state, both the emitter-base and collector-base junctions are...
861
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
7.0K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.0K
Detection of Black Holes
2.6K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.6K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
664
Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
664
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
11.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.4K


