Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging
Published on: June 2, 2009
Performance of compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction for single-photon emission computed tomography from
Norikazu Matsutomo1, Kaoru Fukaya2, Takeyuki Hashimoto1
1Departments of Medical Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of compressed sensing (CS)-based iterative reconstruction (CS-IR) from undersampled projection data in I-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
Materials And Methods:
We used the cylinder/sphere and the striatal digital phantom models. The number of projections was set at 120, 90, 60, 40, and 30 projections. SPECT images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), maximum likelihood-expectation maximization (ML-EM), and CS-IR. The total-variation transform with local image gradient in L1-norm was adopted in our CS algorithm. The efficacy of CS-IR was examined in terms of the spatial resolution, recovery coefficient, aspect ratio (ASR), activity concentration linearity, percent coefficient of variation (%CV), and specific binding ratio.
Results:
As the number of projections decreased, the following results were observed. No differences of the spatial resolution and activity concentration linearity were observed between reconstruction methods. However, ASR for FBP slightly increased in contrast to ML-EM and CS-IR for which ASR remained constant. There were not any clear differences between recovery coefficients obtained from each reconstruction. The %CV obtained by CS-IR was significantly superior to that obtained by other reconstructions at all number of projections: for example, the %CV obtained by 60 projection CS-IR was equivalent to that obtained by 120 projection FBP and ML-EM. The specific binding ratio did not change with the number of projections, and there were no significant differences between FBP, ML-EM, and CS-IR.
Conclusion:
We have demonstrated that CS-IR with decreased number of projections can provide a good image quality compared with commonly used SPECT reconstruction methods. This CS could help to reduce overall acquisition time in I-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane SPECT, particularly.
More Related Videos
10:21Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
Published on: August 8, 2019
11:09High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Emission Spectra