Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
Published on: February 29, 2020
How to Make or Break Implicit Bias Instruction: Implications for Curriculum Development.
Cristina M Gonzalez1, Ramya J Garba, Alyssa Liguori
1C.M. Gonzalez is associate professor of medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, scholar, Macy Faculty Scholars Program, and former scholar, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Amos Medical Faculty Development Program. R.J. Garba is a doctoral candidate, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. A. Liguori is research assistant, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. P.R. Marantz is associate dean for clinical education and professor, Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. M.D. McKee is codirector and professor, Division of Research, Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. M.L. Lypson is director of medical and dental education, Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, clinical professor of medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, and adjunct clinical professor of medicine and learning health sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, and University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Faculty face challenges in teaching implicit bias due to personal backgrounds and institutional factors. Implementing formalized curricula and faculty development is crucial for effective implicit bias education.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Social Psychology
- Health Equity
Background:
- Implicit bias significantly impacts healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.
- Effective strategies for recognizing and managing implicit bias are essential in medical education.
- Faculty experiences in facilitating discussions on sensitive topics like implicit bias require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze faculty experiences in facilitating discussions on racial and ethnic implicit bias recognition and management within an institutional curriculum.
- To identify challenges and facilitators influencing faculty's ability to teach implicit bias.
- To gather faculty recommendations for improving implicit bias education.
Main Methods:
- Grounded theory methodology was employed to analyze data.
- 21 in-depth interviews were conducted with faculty involved in implicit bias instruction.
- Interviews focused on experiences with implicit bias discussions and the Implicit Association Test.
Main Results:
- Faculty cited personal background, identity, and institutional values as key influences on their facilitation.
- Resistance from learners and peers presented significant challenges during discussions.
- Faculty emphasized the need for formalized, longitudinal curricula and dedicated faculty development.
Conclusions:
- Faculty require specific training (faculty development) to effectively address challenges in implicit bias discussions.
- Institutional leadership support is vital for successful implementation of implicit bias education.
- Formalized, longitudinal curricula are recommended for comprehensive implicit bias recognition and management training.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Implicit Differentiation
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Fixing Double-strand Breaks

